Back

Spinal Cord Stimulation using time-dynamic pulses achieves faster and longer reversal of allodynia compared to tonic pulses in a rat model of neuropathic pain

Edhi, M.; Zhu, C.; Jeong, K.-S.; Rogness, V.; Esteller, R.; Saab, C. Y.

2023-03-10 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.03.07.531522 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) utilizing time-dynamic pulses (TDPs) is an emergent field of neuromodulation that continuously and automatically modulates pulse parameters. We previously demonstrated that TDPs delivered for 60 min at sub-paresthesia amplitudes significantly reversed allodynia in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Because we observed these anti-allodynic effects persisted post-cessation, we investigated the extended temporal dynamics of SCS-induced analgesia. We hypothesized that TDPs achieve a longer duration of analgesia than tonic stimulation. Both TDPs and tonic stimulation reversed PWT to near pre-chronificiation levels within 30 minutes. Most TDPs exhibited significantly slower ramp-up slope (analgesia wash-in rates) compared to tonic stimulation (amplitude modulation: 0.16{+/-}0.03 min-1, pulse width modulation: 0.18{+/-}0.05 min-1, stochastic modulation: 0.17{+/-}0.04 min-1, tonic: 0.31{+/-}0.06 min-1). All TDPs showed slower wind-down slopes (analgesia wash-out rates) compared to tonic (-0.29{+/-}0.07 min-1), with pulse width modulation (-0.11{+/-}0.02 min-1) reaching significance. Extending SCS from 60 to 90 minutes revealed all TDPs maintain analgesic efficacy longer than tonic stimulation, which decreased significantly at both 75 and 90 minutes (from 13.8{+/-}0.5 g to 12.3{+/-}0.9 g and to 11.0{+/-}0.5 g, respectively). Although TDPs and tonic stimulation comparably mitigated allodynia, TDPs generally exhibited slower temporal dynamics, suggesting longer-lasting analgesic effects and potentially different mechanisms of action.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.