Back

Active self-touch restores bodily self-awareness following disruption by the rubber hand illusion

Crivelli, D.; Cataldo, A.; Bottini, G.; Gomi, H.; Haggard, P.

2023-03-08 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.03.06.531301 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bodily self-awareness relies on a constant integration of visual, tactile, proprioceptive, and motor signals. In the "Rubber Hand Illusion" (RHI), conflicting visuo-tactile stimuli lead to changes in self- awareness. It remains unclear whether other, somatic signals could compensate for the alterations in self-awareness caused by visual information about the body. Here, we used the RHI in combination with robot-mediated self-touch to systematically investigate the role of tactile, proprioceptive, and motor signals in protecting and restoring bodily self-awareness. Participants moved the handle of a leader robot with their right hand and simultaneously received corresponding tactile feedback on their left hand from a follower robot. This self-touch stimulation was performed either before or after the induction of a classical RHI. Across three experiments, active self-touch delivered after - but not before - the RHI, significantly reduced the proprioceptive drift caused by RHI, supporting a restorative role of active self-touch on bodily self-awareness. The effect was not present during involuntary self-touch, where the participants hand was passively moved, suggesting that the restorative effect depends on the presence of a voluntary motor command, and that synchrony of bilateral sensory events is insufficient. Unimodal control conditions confirmed that the coordination of both tactile and motor components of self-touch was necessary to restore bodily self-awareness. These results suggest that voluntary self-touch can restore an intrinsic representation of the body following visual capture during RHI.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.