Back

Acute effects of static stretching to hamstrings on spatiotemporal variables and leg kinematics in late swing at maximal sprint speed phase and its relationship with Nordic hamstring strength

Ozaki, Y.; Ueda, T.

2023-03-09 sports medicine
10.1101/2023.03.06.23286888 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study aimed to determine the acute effects of static stretching of the hamstrings on maximal sprint speed and its spatiotemporal variables, and lower limb kinematics during the late swing phase, and its relationship with Nordic hamstring strength. Sixteen healthy male college sprinters were asked to sprint 80 m without static stretching and with static stretching of the hamstrings for 120 s per leg before the sprint, and both conditions were counterbalanced. The knee flexion peak force and torque were measured using the Nordic hamstring. The differences between no static stretch and static stretch, and their relationship with Nordic hamstring strength were investigated. The results showed that the touchdown distance and support time increased, and flight distance decreased in under static stretch conditions with a decrease in maximal sprint speed. Moreover, under static stretch conditions, the angular velocity of knee extension at contralateral release was lower, while the theoretical hamstring length (difference between knee angle and hip angle) at ipsilateral touchdown was greater. In addition, the lower the peak force and torque of the Nordic hamstring, the more significant the decrease in maximal sprint speed, increase in support time, decrease in flight distance, and decrease in peak angular velocity of hip extension at static stretch. Furthermore, the more significant the decrease in maximal sprint speed at static stretch, the smaller the peak theoretical hamstring length at the no static stretch. Therefore, it is suggested that long- term static stretching immediately before sprinting in sprinters with poor Nordic hamstring strength and low hamstring compliance during the late swing phase may induce unfavorable kinematics to prevent hamstring strain injury and maximal sprint speed reduction.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
33.1%
2
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
6
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
14
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
15
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
19
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
20
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%