The single item burnout measure is a reliable and valid tool to measure occupational burnout
Galanis, P. A.; Katsiroumpa, A.; Vraka, I.; Siskou, O.; Konstantakopoulou, O.; Katsoulas, T.; Gallos, P.; Kaitelidou, D.
Show abstract
OBJECTIVETo estimate the reliability and the validity of the single item burnout measure in a sample of nurses in Greece. METHODWe conducted an online cross-sectional study in Greece with 963 nurses. Data were collected during October 2022. We measured demographic and work-related variables of nurses, i.e. gender, age, chronic disease, self-rated health status, years of experience, and working in COVID-19 ward/intensive care unit. We used the single item burnout (SIB) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) to measure occupational burnout. Moreover, we used the COVID-19 burnout scale (COVID-19-BS) to measure nurses burnout during the pandemic, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) to measure anxiety and depression among nurses. RESULTSIntraclass correlation coefficient between the two measurements of the SIB during the test-retest study was 0.986 indicating excellent reliability of the SIB. We found a high correlation between CBI factors and SIB (p<0.001), a moderate correlation between PHQ-4 and SIB (p<0.001), and a low to moderate correlation between COVID-19-BS and SIB (p<0.001). Therefore, concurrent validity of SIB was excellent. Moreover, SIB had high discriminant validity. In particular, nurses with a chronic disease, those with a very poor/poor/moderate health status, and those working in COVID-19 ward/intensive care unit had higher levels of burnout according to the SIB (p<0.001 in all cases). Moreover, we found a positive relationship between years of experience and SIB score (r=0.13, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONSThe single item burnout measure is a brief, reliable, and valid tool that we can use as a screening measure to identify individuals at high risk of burnout.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High prevalence of burnout syndrome among medical and nonmedical residents during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 95%
- Ethical and psychosocial considerations for hospital personnel in the Covid-19 crisis: Moral injury and resilience 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support 95%
- A Cross-sectional Study on Perceived Workplace Health Support and Health-Related Quality of Life 93%
- Workplace Infection Prevention Control Measures and Work Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic among Japanese Workers: A Prospective Cohort Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical practice competencies for standard critical care nursing: Consensus statement based on a systematic review and Delphi survey 94%
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 94%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 96%
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and medically approved COVID-19 infection risk: understanding the mental health dimension of the pandemic. A German hospital case study 92%
- Protocol of a Study to Benchmark Occupational Health and Safety in Japan: W2S-Ohpm Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The managerial role and psychosocial factors of job satisfaction: a cross-sectional study among Wittyfit’s users 95%
- On the frontlines in Shanghai: Stress, burnout and perceived benefit among COVID-19 testers and other personnel during the Omicron wave lockdown 95%
- Intensity of home-based telework and work engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.