Distinct horizontal transfer mechanisms for type I and type V CRISPR-associated transposons
Hu, K.; Chou, C.-W.; Wilke, C. O.; Finkelstein, I. J.
Show abstract
CRISPR-associated transposons (CASTs) co-opt CRISPR-Cas proteins and Tn7-family transposons for RNA-guided vertical and horizontal transmission. CASTs encode minimal CRISPR arrays but cant acquire new spacers. Here, we show that CASTs instead co-opt defense-associated CRISPR arrays for horizontal transmission. A bioinformatic analysis shows that all CAST sub-types co-occur with defense-associated CRISPR-Cas systems. Using an E. coli quantitative transposition assay, we show that CASTs use CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) from these defense systems for horizontal gene transfer. A high-resolution structure of the type I-F CAST-Cascade in complex with a type III-B crRNA reveals that Cas6 recognizes direct repeats via sequence-independent{pi} - {pi} interactions. In addition to using heterologous CRISPR arrays, type V CASTs can also transpose via a crRNA-independent unguided mechanism, even when the S15 co-factor is over-expressed. Over-expressing S15 and the trans-activating CRISPR RNA (tracrRNA) or a single guide RNA (sgRNA) reduces, but does not abrogate, off-target integration for type V CASTs. Exploiting new spacers in defense-associated CRISPR arrays explains how CASTs horizontally transfer to new hosts. More broadly, this work will guide further efforts to engineer the activity and specificity of CASTs for gene editing applications.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural role for DNA Ligase IV in promoting the fidelity of non-homologous end joining 95%
- Binding of guide piRNA triggers methylation of the unstructured N-terminal region of Aub leading to assembly of the piRNA amplification complex 94%
- Molecular basis of CTCF binding polarity in genome folding 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.