Temporal Cohort Identification for Alzheimer's Disease with Sequences of Clinical Records
Estiri, H.; Azhir, A.; Blacker, D. L.; Ritchie, C. S.; Patel, C. J.; Murphy, S. N.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDAlzheimers Disease (AD) is a complex clinical phenotype with unprecedented social and economic tolls in an aging global population. Real World Data (RWD) from electronic health records (EHRs) offer opportunities to accelerate precision drug development and scale epidemiological research on AD. A precise characterization of AD cohorts is needed to address the noise abundant in RWD. METHODSWe conducted a retrospective cohort study to develop and test computational models for AD cohort identification using clinical data from 8 Massachusetts healthcare systems. We mined temporal representations from EHR data using a novel transitive sequential pattern mining algorithm (tSPM) to train and validate our models. We then tested our models against a held-out test set from a review of medical records to adjudicate the presence of AD. We trained two classes of models using Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) to compare the utility of AD diagnosis records versus the tSPM temporal representations (comprising sequences of diagnosis and medication observations) from electronic medical records for characterizing AD cohorts. RESULTSIn a group of 4,985 patients, we identified 219 sequences of medication-diagnosis records for constructing the best classification models. The models with the sequential features improved AD classification by a magnitude of up to 16 percent (over the use of AD diagnosis codes). Six groups of sequences, which we refer to as temporal digital markers, were identified for characterizing the AD cohorts, including sequences that involved (1) a symptom or (2) a risk factor in the past, followed by an AD diagnosis, (3) AD medications, (4) indirect risk factors, symptom management, and potential side effects, (5) comorbidities with possible shared roots or side effects, and (6) plural encounters with of AD diagnosis codes. Discussions of how the identified sequential patterns can be interpreted are provided. CONCLUSIONSWe present sequential patterns of diagnosis and medication codes from electronic medical records, as digital markers of Alzheimers Disease. Classification algorithms developed on the sequential patterns can replace standard features from EHRs to enrich phenotype modeling.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for the Early Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias 97%
- Real-world datasets for the International Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias (InRAD) and other registries: an international consensus 94%
- Continuous Associations Between Remote Self-Administered Cognitive Measures and Imaging Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Learn Optimal Regimen Plan for Alzheimer’s Disease 93%
- Large Language Models Facilitate the Generation of Electronic Health Record Phenotyping Algorithms 92%
- Extraction of Sleep Information from Clinical Notes of Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease Using Natural Language Processing 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning Prediction of Incidence of Alzheimers Disease Using Large-Scale Administrative Health Data 96%
- Interpretable deep learning approach for extracting cognitive features from hand-drawn images of intersecting pentagons in older adults 95%
- A scoping review of remote and unsupervised digital cognitive assessments in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ADataViewer: Exploring Semantically Harmonized Alzheimer’s Disease Cohort Datasets 95%
- Comparison and aggregation of event sequences across ten cohorts to describe the consensus biomarker evolution in Alzheimer’s disease 94%
- AlzGPS: A Genome-wide Positioning Systems Platform to Catalyze Multi-omics for Alzheimer's Therapeutic Discovery 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.