Incremental improvements in tractometry-based brain-age modeling with deep learning
Rokem, A.; Qiao, J.; Yeatman, J. D.; Richie-Halford, A.
Show abstract
Multivariate measurements of human brain white matter (WM) with diffusion MRI (dMRI) provide information about the role of WM in a variety of cognitive functions and in brain health. Statistical models take advantage of the regularities in these data to make inferences about individual differences. For example, dMRI data provide the basis for accurate brain-age models - models that predict the chronological age of participants from WM tissue properties. Deep learning (DL) models are powerful machine learning models, which have been shown to provide benefits in many multivariate analysis settings. We investigated whether DL would provide substantial improvements for brain-age models based on dMRI measurements of WM in a large sample of children and adolescents. We found that some DL models fit the data better than a linear baseline, but the differences are small. In particular, recurrent neural network architectures provide up to [~]6% improvement in accuracy. This suggests that information about WM development is mostly accessible with linear models, and does not require the additional invariance and non-linearity offered by DL models. However, in some applications this incremental improvement may prove critical. We provide open-source software that fits DL models to dMRI data (https://yeatmanlab.github.io/AFQ-Insight).
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DeepComBat: A Statistically Motivated, Hyperparameter-Robust, Deep Learning Approach to Harmonization of Neuroimaging Data 95%
- Brain Age Prediction: Deep Models Need a Hand to Generalize 95%
- Longitudinally stable, brain-based predictive models mediate the relationships between childhood cognition and socio-demographic, psychological and genetic factors 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.