Examining Longitudinal Markers of Bladder Cancer Recurrence Through a Semi-Autonomous Machine Learning System for Quantifying Specimen Atypia from Urine Cytology
Levy, J.; Chan, N.; Marotti, J.; Rodrigues, N.; Ismail, A. A.; Kerr, D.; Gutmann, E.; Glass, R.; Dodge, C.; Suriawinata, A.; Christensen, B.; Liu, X.; Vaickus, L.
Show abstract
Urine cytology (UC) is generally considered the primary approach for screening for recurrence of bladder cancer. However, it is currently unclear how best to use cytological exams themselves for the assessment and early detection of recurrence, beyond identifying a positive finding which requires more invasive methods to confirm recurrence and decide on therapeutic options. As screening programs are frequent, and can be burdensome, finding quantitative means to reduce this burden for patients, cytopathologists and urologists is an important endeavor and can improve both the efficiency and reliability of findings. Additionally, identifying ways to risk-stratify patients is crucial for improving quality of life while reducing the risk of future recurrence or progression of the cancer. In this study, we leveraged a computational machine learning tool, AutoParis-X, to extract imaging features from UC exams longitudinally to study the predictive potential of urine cytology for assessing recurrence risk. This study examined how the significance of imaging predictors changes over time before and after surgery to determine which predictors and time periods are most relevant for assessing recurrence risk. Results indicate that imaging predictors extracted using AutoParis-X can predict recurrence as well or better than traditional cytological / histological assessments alone and that the predictiveness of these features is variable across time, with key differences in overall specimen atypia identified immediately before tumor recurrence. Further research will clarify how computational methods can be effectively utilized in high volume screening programs to improve recurrence detection and complement traditional modes of assessment.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial intelligence-driven morphology-based enrichment of malignant cells from body fluid 94%
- Stratification Of Chemotherapy-Treated Stage III Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Multiplexed Imaging And Single Cell Analysis Of T Cell Populations 93%
- Detection of prostate cancer in 3D pathology datasets via generative immunolabeling 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial intelligence-based histopathology image analysis identifies a novel subset of endometrial cancers with distinct genomic features and unfavourable outcome 96%
- The Impact of Digital Histopathology Batch Effect on Deep Learning Model Accuracy and Bias 95%
- Spatial transcriptomics reveals ovarian cancer subclones with distinct tumour microenvironments 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gravity-based microfiltration reveals unexpected prevalence of circulating tumor cell clusters in ovarian and colorectal cancer 93%
- LUNAR: A Deep Learning Model to Predict Glioma Recurrence Using Integrated Genomic and Clinical Data 91%
- Multi-resolution deep learning characterizestertiary lymphoid structures in solid tumors 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Spatial Proteomic Signatures of Colon Tumor Metastasis: A Digital Spatial Profiling Approach 91%
- Detection of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Grading Dysplasia on Histopathologic Slides Using Deep Learning 90%
- KH-type splicing regulatory protein controls colorectal cancer cell growth and modulates the tumor microenvironment 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.