Back

Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation in Heart Failure Over Time: An Analysis of the Colorado All Payer Claims Database

Deng, L.; Polsinelli, V. B.; Kini, V.; Wilson, M.; Peterson, P. N.; Bekelman, D.; Flint, K. M.

2023-03-05 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.03.01.23286662 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite CMS coverage expansion supporting cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with heart failure (HF) in 2014, data suggest that utilization among patients with HF is low. We describe CR participation and adherence among HF patients in Colorado. MethodsData from the Colorado All-Payer Claims Database from 2010-2018 were used. Patients with HF were identified by [&ge;]2 claims with a HF diagnosis code, then grouped by type of HF (HFrEF, HFpEF, unspecified). CR participation and adherence were identified using CR CPT codes. Participation rates were calculated by quarter of each year. Cochran-Armitage tests determined whether temporal trends were significant. Association between CR participation and payer source was examined in adjusted logistic regression models. Results263,476 patients with HF were identified. 4.77% of all HF patients attended CR at least once; this result was similar for HFpEF (4.35%), unspecified HF (4.15%), and higher in the HFrEF group (8.25%). Overall adherence was poor (median 8 visits, IQR 3-18; full adherence=36 visits). CR participation over time increased (P<0.01) for all HF patients. Compared to patients with commercial insurance, patients with Medicare, Medicaid, or Medicare Advantage were less likely to have participated in CR at least once (P<0.01). Race, sex and presence of another indication for CR were also associated with at least one CR visit (P<0.01). ConclusionsIn the state of Colorado, CR participation improved from 2010-2018 among all patients with HF. Our data suggest that payer source, race, sex and presence of another indication for CR drive CR participation in patients with HF.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
7
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
8
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
14
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
24
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%