Incorporating clinical, genomic profiles and polygenic risk scores for the subtyping of depressive disorders
Yin, L.; Lin, Y.; Lui, S. S.-Y.; So, H.-C.
Show abstract
Precise stratification of clinical patients into more homogeneous disease subgroups could address the heterogeneity of disease phenotypes and enhance our understanding on possible biological mechanisms and pathophysiology of more specified subtypes. This approach could promote individualized and effective prevention/intervention strategies. In the extant literature, subtyping of patients with depressive disorders (Dep) mainly utilized clinical features only. Genomics data could be useful subtyping features but advanced methods are needed for subtyping psychiatric entities such as depression. To solve this issue, we proposed a novel disease subtyping framework for complex diseases such as Dep. It combines brain structural features with genotype-predicted gene expression levels of relevant brain tissues as well as polygenic risk scores (PRS) of related disorders. It is able to classify patients into both clinically and biologically homogeneous subgroups, based on a multiview biclustering method. Moreover, causal inference was employed to identify causally relevant genes in different brain tissues to inform feature selection under the proposed framework. We verified the reliability of the subtyping model by internal and external validation. The calculated prediction strengths(PS) (average PS:0.896, min PS: 0.854) supported the robustness and generalizability of our proposed approach. External validation results demonstrated that our proposed approach could stratify Dep patients into subgroups with varied treatment responses and hospitalization risks. Besides, some subtype-defining genes in our study overlapped with several well-known susceptibility genes for depression and were involved in the pathophysiology for the disease. Encouragingly, many enriched drugs based on identified subtype-defining genes have been reported in previous studies to be effective in reducing depression-related symptoms.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual Deviations from Normative Electroencephalographic Connectivity Predict Antidepressant Response 93%
- Consistent Differential Effects of Bupropion and Mirtazapine in Major Depression 92%
- Druggable causal genes of bipolar disorder identified through Mendelian Randomization analysis offer a route to intervention in integrated stress response 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mendelian randomization integrating GWAS and eQTL data revealed genes pleiotropically associated with major depressive disorder 94%
- Affinity Scores: An Individual-centric Fingerprinting Framework for Neuropsychiatric Disorders 94%
- Differential and spatial expression meta-analysis of genes identified in genome-wide association studies of depression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Downregulated NPAS4 in multiple brain regions is associated with Major Depressive Disorder 93%
- Altered directed functional connectivity of the right amygdala in depression: high-density EEG study 92%
- Candidate genes associated with neurological manifestations of COVID-19: Meta-analysis using multiple computational approaches 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Habenula Neural Biomarker Simultaneously Tracks Weekly and Daily Symptom Variations during Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy for Depression 93%
- Predicting mutation-disease associations through protein interactions via deep learning 91%
- The ChAMP App: A Scalable mHealth Technology for Detecting Digital Phenotypes of Early Childhood Mental Health 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.