Burden and risk factors for Achilles tendinopathy in the military population from 2006 to 2015. A retrospective cohort study.
Sullivan, C. K.; Janney, C. F.; Fraser, J. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundAnkle-foot conditions are ubiquitous in the US Military. The objective of this study was to evaluate the burden and associated factors of Achilles tendinopathy (AT). MethodsThe Defense Medical Epidemiology Database was used to identify all diagnosed AT in military personnel from 2006 to 2015. Prevalence of AT was calculated and compared by year, service branch, and military rank. Unadjusted and adjusted assessment of injury risk were calculated. ResultsOfficers incurred 37,939 episodes at a prevalence of 17.65 per 1000 (male officers: 18.20 per 1000; female officers: 14.80 per 1000). Among enlisted personnel, there were 116,122 episodes of AT that occurred in 12.22 per 1000 (male enlisted: 12.07 per 1000; female enlisted: 13.22 per 1000). All officer specialties had significantly higher risk of AT episodes compared to the ground and naval gunfire officers (PR: 1.04-1.43), with aviation demonstrating a significant protective effect (PR: 0.65). Among enlisted specialties, maritime/naval specialties had reduced risk (PR: 0.82), with all specialties (except aviation) having increased risk of AT compared to infantry (PR: 1.07-1.71). There were multiple associated factors identified, to include sex, age, rank, military occupation, and service branch. ConclusionsAT was ubiquitous in the US military, with a progressive increase in prevalence during the study epoch. There were multiple associated factors identified, to include sex, age, rank, military occupation, and service branch. These findings highlight both the need for prophylactic interventions and identification of the populations with the greatest need.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol 94%
- The Incidence and Severity of COVID-19 in Adult Professional Soccer Players 92%
- Action observation intervention using three - dimensional movies improves the usability of hands with distal radius fractures in daily life: a nonrandomized controlled trial in women 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gynaecological health patterns and motherhood experiences of female professional football players 92%
- Differences in COVID-19 Risk by Race and County-Level Social Determinants of Health Among Veterans 90%
- Successful reboot of high-performance sporting activities by Japanese national women’s handball team in Tokyo, 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic: An initiative by Japan Sports-Cyber Physical System (JS-CPS) of Sports Research Innovation Project (SRIP) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perception of yips among professional Japanese golfers: perspectives and challenges 93%
- Characteristics of patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the low back 92%
- Modified FRAX Score for Prediction of Fall-induced Hip Fractures; The Added Value of Fall Energy, Number, and Social Vulnerability Index 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can prognostic factors for indirect muscle injuries in elite football (soccer) players be identified using data from preseason screening? An exploratory analysis using routinely-collected periodic health examination records 93%
- Comparative Computed Tomography with Stress Manoeuvres for Diagnosing Distal Isolated Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injury in Acute Ankle Sprain: a Protocol for an Accuracy-Test Prospective Study. 93%
- Factors associated with self-reported health among New Zealand military Veterans: a cross-sectional study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-Center Hospital and Outpatient Opioid Use for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease 91%
- Socioeconomic and comorbid factors affecting mortality and length of stay in COVID-19 91%
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Ultrasound Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.