neuroGPT-X: Towards an Accountable Expert Opinion Tool for Vestibular Schwannoma
Guo, E.; Gupta, M.; Sinha, S.; Rössler, K.; Tatagiba, M.; Akagami, R.; Al-Mefty, O.; Sugiyama, T.; Stieg, P. E.; Pickett, G. E.; de Lotbiniere-Bassett, M.; Singh, R.; Lama, S.; Sutherland, G. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe global launch of ChatGPT on November 30, 2022 has sparked widespread public interest in large language models (LLMs), and interest in the medical community is growing. Indeed, recent preprints on medRxiv have examined ChatGPT and GPT-3 in the context of standardized exams, such as the United States Medical Licensing Examination. These studies demonstrate modest performance relative to national averages. In this work, we enhance OpenAIs GPT-3 model through zero-shot learning, anticipating that it outperforms experienced neurosurgeons in written question-answer tasks for common clinical and surgical questions on vestibular schwannoma. We aimed to address LLM accountability by including in-text citations and references to the responses provided by GPT-3. MethodsThe analysis involved (i) creating a dataset through web scraping, (ii) developing a chat-based platform called neuroGPT-X, (iii) enlisting expert neurosurgeons across international centers to create and answer questions and evaluate responses, and (iv) analyzing the evaluation results on the management of vestibular schwannoma. The survey had a blinded and unblinded phase. In the blinded phase, a neurosurgeon with 30+ years of experience curated 15 questions regarding common clinical and surgical contexts of vestibular schwannoma. Then, four neurosurgeons, ChatGPT (January 30, 2023 model, aka naive GPT), and a context-enriched GPT model independently provided their responses. Three experienced neurosurgeons blindly evaluated the responses for accuracy, coherence, relevance, thoroughness, speed, and overall rating. Then, all seven neurosurgeons were unblinded to all responses and provided their thoughts on the potential of expert LLMs in the clinical setting. FindingsBoth the naive and content-enriched GPT models provided faster responses to the standardized question set (p<0.01) than expert neurosurgeon respondents. Moreover, responses from both models were consistently non-inferior in accuracy, coherence, relevance, thoroughness, and overall performance, and were often rated higher than expert responses. Importantly, context enrichment of GPT with relevant scientific literature did not significantly affect speed (p>0.999) or performance across the aforementioned domains (p>0.999). Of interest, all expert surgeons expressed concerns about the reliability of GPT in accurately addressing the nuances and controversies surrounding the management of vestibular schwannoma. Further, we developed neuroGPT-X, a chat-based platform designed to provide point-of-care clinical support and mitigate limitations of human memory. neuroGPT-X incorporates features such as in-text citations and references to enable accurate, relevant, and reliable information in real-time. InterpretationA context-enriched GPT model provided non-inferior responses compared to experienced neurosurgeons in generating written responses to a complex neurosurgical problem for which evidence-based consensus for management is lacking. We show that context enrichment of LLMs is well-suited to transform clinical practice by providing subspecialty-level answers to clinical questions in an accountable manner. Research in ContextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched PubMed for "(vestibular schwannoma OR acoustic schwannoma) AND (GPT-3 OR Generative Pretrained Transformer OR large language model)" with no filters and identified no relevant articles. We then searched PubMed using the string "(subspecialty OR neurosurgery OR physician) AND (GPT-3 OR Generative Pretrained Transformer OR large language model) AND (fine-tuning OR context enrichment)" with no filters and identified three studies. One study noted that domain-specific knowledge enhanced pre-trained language models. Added value of this studyTo our knowledge, this is the first study to show the non-inferiority of a context-enriched LLM in a question-answer task on common clinical and surgical questions compared to experienced neurosurgeons worldwide, determined by their neurosurgical colleagues. Furthermore, we developed the first online platform incorporating an LLM, chat memory, in-text citations, and references regarding comprehensive vestibular schwannoma management. To assess the models performance, a neurosurgeon with 30+ years of experience managing patients with vestibular schwannoma curated 15 questions to the model, ChatGPT, and four international expert neurosurgeons. A separate, blinded group of three expert neurosurgeons assessed these answers for accuracy, coherence, relevance, thoroughness, speed, and overall rating. This study demonstrated the capability of context-enriched LLMs as point-of-care informational aids. Importantly, all expert surgeons raised questions regarding the nuances and role of human experience and intuition that GPT may not capture in generating opinions or recommendations. Implications of all the available evidenceThe present study, with its subspecialist-level performance and interpretable results, suggests that context-enriched LLMs show promise as a point-of-care medical resource. Evaluations from experienced neurosurgeons showed that a context-enriched GPT model was rated similarly to neurosurgeon responses across evaluation domains in this study. This work serves as a springboard for expanding this tool into more medical specialties, incorporating evidence-based clinical information, and developing expert-level dialogue surrounding LLMs in healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bridging the Literacy Gap for Surgical Consents: An AI-Human Expert Collaborative Approach 94%
- A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation 92%
- Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ChatGPT in glioma patient adjuvant therapy decision making: ready to assume the role of a doctor in the tumour board? 94%
- Natural Language Word-Embeddings as a glimpse into healthcare at the End Of Life 91%
- The effect of digital-enabled multidisciplinary therapy conferences on efficiency and quality of the decision making in prostate-cancer care 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol For Human Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Clinical Consultations 92%
- ChatGPT- versus human-generated answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes: a Turing test-inspired survey among employees of a Danish diabetes center 91%
- A method for rapid machine learning development for data mining with Doctor-In-The-Loop 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Enhances Detection of Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer from mpMRI of 1001 Patients 90%
- Unpacking Unstructured Data: A Pilot Study on Extracting Insights from Neuropathological Reports of Parkinson's Disease Patients using Large Language Models 90%
- tUbe net: a generalisable deep learning tool for 3D vessel segmentation 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Extent of Resection and Functional Outcomes in Diffuse Low-Grade Glioma: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis 88%
- Leveraging Single-Cell Sequencing to Classify and Characterize Tumor Subgroups in Bulk RNA-Sequencing Data 88%
- Rapid DNA methylation-based classification of pediatric brain tumours from ultrasonic aspirate specimens 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.