Back

Cooperativity between H3.3K27M and PDGFRA poses multiple therapeutic vulnerabilities in human iPSC-derived diffuse midline glioma avatars

Skinner, K. R.; Koga, T.; Miki, S.; Gruener, R. F.; Grigore, F.-N.; Torii, E. H.; Seelig, D. M.; Suzuki, Y.; Kawauchi, D.; Lin, B.; Malicki, D. M.; Chen, C. C.; Benveniste, E. N.; Patel, R. P.; McFarland, B. C.; Huang, R. S.; Jones, C.; Mackay, A.; Miller, C. R.; Furnari, F. B.

2023-02-24 genomics
10.1101/2023.02.24.528982 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is a leading cause of brain tumor death in children. In addition to hallmark H3.3K27M mutations, significant subsets also harbor alterations of other genes, such as TP53 and PDGFRA. Despite the prevalence of H3.3K27M, the results of clinical trials in DMG have been mixed, possibly due to the lack of models recapitulating its genetic heterogeneity. To address this gap, we developed human iPSC-derived tumor models harboring TP53R248Q with or without heterozygous H3.3K27M and/or PDGFRAD842V overexpression. The combination of H3.3K27M and PDGFRAD842V resulted in more proliferative tumors when gene-edited neural progenitor (NP) cells were implanted into mouse brains compared to NP with either mutation alone. Transcriptomic comparison of tumors and their NP cells of origin identified conserved JAK/STAT pathway activation across genotypes as characteristic of malignant transformation. Conversely, integrated genome-wide epigenomic and transcriptomic analyses, as well as rational pharmacologic inhibition, revealed targetable vulnerabilities unique to the TP53R248Q; H3.3K27M; PDGFRAD842V tumors and related to their aggressive growth phenotype. These include AREG-mediated cell cycle control, altered metabolism, and vulnerability to combination ONC201/trametinib treatment. Taken together, these data suggest that cooperation between H3.3K27M and PDGFRA influences tumor biology, underscoring the need for better molecular stratification in DMG clinical trials.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.3%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 15%
7.1%
3
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.6%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.3%
6
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.3%
7
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
8
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
Genes & Development
90 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
10
Neuro-Oncology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
17
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
21
Molecular Cell
350 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.6%
24
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%