Back

Effects of ploidy and genetic diversity on competitive outcomes.

Perez-Romero, J. A.; Garcia-Munoz, A.; Olivieri, E.; Munoz-Pajares, A. J.; Abdelaziz, M.; Godoy, O.

2023-02-23 ecology
10.1101/2023.02.23.529645 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIGenetic diversity affects evolutionary trajectories but their ultimate effects on ecological interactions and community dynamics remains poorly understood. It has been hypothesized that phenotypic novelties produced by ploidy and heterozygosity modify the ecological interactions between novel genotypes and more ancient locally adapted ones, and therefore, their opportunities to coexist. C_LIO_LIWe performed a greenhouse competition experiment with three taxa of the Erysimum incanum species complex differing in ploidy (2x, 4x and 6x) and heterozygosity (high and low). This experiment allows us to parameterize a population model to test the effect of genetic diversity on modulating the ecological forces that determine the outcome of competition, niche and fitness differences. C_LIO_LIDepending on whether ploidy variation and the level of heterozygosity made interspecific competition greater or smaller than intraspecific competition, we predicted either priority effects or coexistence. Such competitive outcome differences were explained by the phenotypic expression in the number of stalks (plant size surrogate) with genotypes under priority effects showing more stalks. C_LIO_LIAltogether, our results show that non-polyploid plants can coexist with polyploids contravening theoretical expectations of polyploidy dominance under stable conditions. However, historical contingency such as order of arrival promotes priority effects when adaptive phenotypic optimums strongly compete for space. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
13.8%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
5
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
10
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
14
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
16
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
17
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
27
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%