Back

SPA-STOCSY: An Automated Tool for Identification of Annotated and Non-Annotated Metabolites in High-Throughput NMR Spectra

Han, X.; Wang, W.; Ma, L.; Ramahi, I. A.; Botas, J.; MacKenzie, K.; Allen, G. I.; Young, D. W.; Liu, Z.; Maletic-Savatic, M.

2023-02-22 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.02.22.529564 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is widely used to analyze metabolites in biological samples, but the analysis can be cumbersome and inaccurate. Here, we present a powerful automated tool, SPA-STOCSY (Spatial Clustering Algorithm - Statistical Total Correlation Spectroscopy), which overcomes the challenges by identifying metabolites in each sample with high accuracy. As a data-driven method, SPA-STOCSY estimates all parameters from the input dataset, first investigating the covariance pattern and then calculating the optimal threshold with which to cluster data points belonging to the same structural unit, i.e. metabolite. The generated clusters are then automatically linked to a compound library to identify candidates. To assess SPA-STOCSYs efficiency and accuracy, we applied it to synthesized and real NMR data obtained from Drosophila melanogaster brains and human embryonic stem cells. In the synthesized spectra, SPA outperforms Statistical Recoupling of Variables, an existing method for clustering spectral peaks, by capturing a higher percentage of the signal regions and the close-to-zero noise regions. In the real spectra, SPA-STOCSY performs comparably to operator-based Chenomx analysis but avoids operator bias and performs the analyses in less than seven minutes of total computation time. Overall, SPA-STOCSY is a fast, accurate, and unbiased tool for untargeted analysis of metabolites in the NMR spectra. As such, it might accelerate the utilization of NMR for scientific discoveries, medical diagnostics, and patient-specific decision making.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.