Back

Error-corrected Duplex Sequencing enables direct detection and quantification of mutations in human TK6 cells with remarkable inter-laboratory consistency

Cho, E.; Swartz, C. D.; Williams, A.; Rivas, M.; Recio, L.; Witt, K. L.; Schmidt, E. K.; Yaplee, J.; Smith, T.; Van, P.; Lo, F. Y.; Valentine, C. C.; Salk, J. J.; Marchetti, F.; Smith-Roe, S.; Yauk, C.

2023-02-22 genomics
10.1101/2023.02.22.529418 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Error-corrected Duplex Sequencing (DuplexSeq) enables direct quantification of low-frequency mutations and offers tremendous potential for chemical mutagenicity assessment. We investigated the utility of DuplexSeq to quantify induced mutation frequency (MF) and spectrum in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells exposed to a prototypical DNA alkylating agent, N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU). Furthermore, we explored appropriate experimental parameters for this application, and assessed inter-laboratory reproducibility. In two independent experiments in two laboratories, TK6 cells were exposed to ENU (25-200 {micro}M) and DNA was sequenced 48, 72, and 96 h post-exposure. A DuplexSeq mutagenicity panel targeting twenty 2.4-kb regions distributed across the genome was used to sample diverse, genome-representative sequence contexts. A robust increase in MF that was unaffected by time was observed in both laboratories. Concentration-response in the MF from the two laboratories was strongly positively correlated (R2=0.95). C:G>T:A, T:A>C:G, T:A>A:T, and T:A>G:C mutations increased in consistent, concentration-dependent manners in both laboratories, with high proportions of C:G>T:A at all time points. The target sites responded similarly between the two laboratories and revealed a higher average MF in intergenic regions. These results, demonstrating remarkable reproducibility across time and laboratory for both MF and spectrum, support the high value of DuplexSeq for characterizing chemical mutagenicity in both research and regulatory evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Archives of Toxicology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.2%
3
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Journal of Hazardous Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.3%
6
Oncotarget
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
9
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
11
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
13
Toxicological Sciences
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.1%
15
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
17
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
19
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
21
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
22
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
25
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
26
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
Biotechnology Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
30
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%