Back

Ketamine Effects on Energy Metabolism, Functional Connectivity and Working Memory in Healthy Humans

Driesen, N. R.; Herman, P.; Rowland, M. A.; Thompson, G.; Qiu, M.; He, G.; Fineberg, S. K.; Barron, D. S.; Helgeson, L.; Lacadie, C.; Chow, R.; Gueorguieva, R.; Straun, T.-C.; Krystal, J. H.; Hyder, F.

2023-02-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.02.21.529425 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Working memory (WM) is a crucial resource for temporary memory storage and the guiding of ongoing behavior. N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors (NMDARs) are thought to support the neural underpinnings of WM. Ketamine is an NMDAR antagonist that has cognitive and behavioral effects at subanesthetic doses. To shed light on subanesthetic ketamine effects on brain function, we employed a multimodal imaging design, combining gas-free calibrated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurement of oxidative metabolism (CMRO2), resting-state cortical functional connectivity assessed with fMRI, and WM-related fMRI. Healthy subjects participated in two scan sessions in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Ketamine increased CMRO2 and cerebral blood flow (CBF) in prefrontal cortex (PFC) and other cortical regions. However, resting-state cortical functional connectivity was not affected. Ketamine did not alter CBF-CMRO2 coupling brain-wide. Higher levels of basal CMRO2 were associated with lower task-related PFC activation and WM accuracy impairment under both saline and ketamine conditions. These observations suggest that CMRO2 and resting-state functional connectivity index distinct dimensions of neural activity. Ketamines impairment of WM-related neural activity and performance appears to be related to its ability to produce cortical metabolic activation. This work illustrates the utility of direct measurement of CMRO2 via calibrated fMRI in studies of drugs that potentially affect neurovascular and neurometabolic coupling.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.