Regional Gene Expression in the Retina, Optic Nerve Head, and Optic Nerve of Mice with Experimental Glaucoma and Optic Nerve Crush
Keuthan, C. J.; Schaub, J.; Wei, M.; Fang, W.; Quillen, S.; Kimball, E.; Johnson, T. V.; Ji, H.; Zack, D. J.; Quigley, H. A.
Show abstract
A major risk factor for glaucomatous optic neuropathy is the level of intraocular pressure (IOP), which can lead to retinal ganglion cell axon injury and cell death. The optic nerve has a rostral unmyelinated portion at the optic nerve head followed by a caudal myelinated region. The unmyelinated region is differentially susceptible to IOP-induced damage in rodent models and in human glaucoma. While several studies have analyzed gene expression changes in the mouse optic nerve following optic nerve injury, few were designed to consider the regional gene expression differences that exist between these distinct areas. We performed bulk RNA-sequencing on the retina and on separately micro-dissected unmyelinated and myelinated optic nerve regions from naive C57BL/6 mice, mice after optic nerve crush, and mice with microbead-induced experimental glaucoma (total = 36). Gene expression patterns in the naive unmyelinated optic nerve showed significant enrichment of the Wnt, Hippo, PI3K-Akt, and transforming growth factor {beta} pathways, as well as extracellular matrix-receptor and cell membrane signaling pathways, compared to the myelinated optic nerve and retina. Gene expression changes induced by both injuries were more extensive in the myelinated optic nerve than the unmyelinated region, and greater after nerve crush than glaucoma. Changes three and fourteen days after injury largely subsided by six weeks. Gene markers of reactive astrocytes did not consistently differ between injury states. Overall, the transcriptomic phenotype of the mouse unmyelinated optic nerve was significantly different from immediately adjacent tissues, likely dominated by expression in astrocytes, whose junctional complexes are inherently important in responding to IOP elevation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Profiling IOP-responsive genes in anterior and posterior ocular tissues in the rat CEI glaucoma model 95%
- miR-26 deficiency causes alterations in lens transcriptome and results in adult-onset cataract 95%
- Inner limiting Membrane Peel Extends In vivo Calcium Imaging of Retinal Ganglion Cell Activity Beyond the Fovea in Non-Human Primate 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing the Characterization and Quantification of Retinal Ganglion Cell Somas in Healthy and Injured Retinas Using Cellpose 95%
- Mechanosensitive channel inhibition attenuates TGFβ2-induced actin cytoskeletal remodeling and reactivity in mouse optic nerve head astrocytes. 95%
- Quantification and image-derived phenotyping of retinal ganglion cell nuclei in the nee mouse model of congenital glaucoma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous Hypoxia Reduces Retinal Ganglion Cell Degeneration in a Mouse Model of Mitochondrial Optic Neuropathy 95%
- Intermittent hypoxia promotes functional neuroprotection from retinal ischemia in untreated first-generation offspring 94%
- Neuroretinal-derived caveolin-1 promotes endotoxin-induced inflammation in the murine retina 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Serum-deprivation response of ARPE-19 cells; expression patterns relevant to age-related macular degeneration. 95%
- Retinoic acid treatment recruits macrophages and increases axonal regeneration after optic nerve injury in the frog Rana pipiens 94%
- Ccr2 suppression by minocycline in Cx3cr1/Ccr2-visualized inherited retinal degeneration 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 in mouse retina light responses 94%
- FH loss in RPE cells causes retinal degeneration in a human RPE-porcine retinal explant co-culture model 94%
- Identification of novel coloboma candidate genes through conserved gene expression analyses across four vertebrate species 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.