Back

Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests Based on Symptom Onset and Close Contact Exposure: A secondary analysis from the Test Us At Home prospective cohort study

Herbert, C.; Wang, B.; Lin, H.; Hafer, N.; Pretz, C.; Stamegna, P.; Tarrant, S.; Hartin, P.; Ferranto, J.; Behar, S.; Wright, C.; Orwig, T.; Suvarna, T.; Harman, E.; Schrader, S.; Nowak, C.; Kheterpal, V.; Orvek, E.; Wong, S.; Zai, A.; Barton, B.; Gerber, B.; Lemon, S. C.; Filippaios, A.; D'Amore, K.; Gibson, L.; Greene, S.; Howard Wilson, S.; Colubri, A.; Achenbach, C.; Murphy, R.; Heetderks, B.; Manabe, Y. C.; O'Connor, L.; Fahey, N.; Luzuriaga, K. L.; Broach, J.; McManus, D. D.; Soni, A.

2023-02-24 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.02.21.23286239 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe performance of rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 (Ag-RDT) in temporal relation to symptom onset or exposure is unknown, as is the impact of vaccination on this relationship. ObjectiveTo evaluate the performance of Ag-RDT compared with RT-PCR based on day after symptom onset or exposure in order to decide on when to test. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe Test Us at Home study was a longitudinal cohort study that enrolled participants over 2 years old across the United States between October 18, 2021 and February 4, 2022. All participants were asked to conduct Ag-RDT and RT-PCR testing every 48 hours over a 15-day period. Participants with one or more symptoms during the study period were included in the Day Post Symptom Onset (DPSO) analyses, while those who reported a COVID-19 exposure were included in the Day Post Exposure (DPE) analysis. ExposureParticipants were asked to self-report any symptoms or known exposures to SARS-CoV-2 every 48-hours, immediately prior to conducting Ag-RDT and RT-PCR testing. The first day a participant reported one or more symptoms was termed DPSO 0, and the day of exposure was DPE 0. Vaccination status was self-reported. Main Outcome and MeasuresResults of Ag-RDT were self-reported (positive, negative, or invalid) and RT-PCR results were analyzed by a central laboratory. Percent positivity of SARS-CoV-2 and sensitivity of Ag-RDT and RT-PCR by DPSO and DPE were stratified by vaccination status and calculated with 95% confidence intervals. ResultsA total of 7,361 participants enrolled in the study. Among them, 2,086 (28.3%) and 546 (7.4%) participants were eligible for the DPSO and DPE analyses, respectively. Unvaccinated participants were nearly twice as likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than vaccinated participants in event of symptoms (PCR+: 27.6% vs 10.1%) or exposure (PCR+: 43.8% vs. 22.2%). The highest proportion of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals tested positive on DPSO 2 and DPE 5-8. Performance of RT-PCR and Ag-RDT did not differ by vaccination status. Ag-RDT detected 78.0% (95% Confidence Interval: 72.56-82.61) of PCR-confirmed infections by DPSO 4. For exposed participants, Ag-RDT detected 84.9% (95% CI: 75.0-91.4) of PCR-confirmed infections by day five post-exposure (DPE 5). Conclusions and RelevancePerformance of Ag-RDT and RT-PCR was highest on DPSO 0-2 and DPE 5 and did not differ by vaccination status. These data suggests that serial testing remains integral to enhancing the performance of Ag-RDT.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.