The effectiveness of digital delivery versus group-based face-to-face delivery of the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme: a non-inferiority retrospective cohort comparison study
Marsden, A. M.; Hann, M.; Barron, E.; McGough, B.; Murray, E.; Valabhji, J.; Cotterill, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionFace-to-face group-based diabetes prevention programmes have been shown to be effective in many settings. Digital delivery may suit some patients, but research comparing the effectiveness of digital with face-to-face delivery is scarce. The aim was to assess if digital delivery of the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP) is non-inferior to group-based face-to-face delivery in terms of weight change, and evaluate factors associated with differential change. The study included those recruited to the NHS DPP in 2017-2018. Research design and methodsIndividual-level data from a face-to-face cohort was compared to two cohorts on a digital pilot who (i) were offered no choice of delivery mode, or (ii) chose digital over face-to-face. Changes in weight at 6 and 12 months were analysed using mixed effects linear regression, having matched participants from the digital pilot to similar participants from face-to-face. ResultsWeight change on the digital pilot was non-inferior to face-to-face at both time points: it was similar in the comparison of those with no choice (difference in weight change: -0.284kg [95% CI: -0.712, 0.144] at 6 months) and greater in digital when participants were offered a choice (-1.165kg [95% CI: -1.841, -0.489]). Interactions between delivery mode and sex, ethnicity, age and deprivation were observed. ConclusionsDigital delivery of the NHS DPP achieved weight loss at least as good as face-to-face. Patients who were offered a choice and opted for digital experienced better weight loss, compared to patients offered face-to-face only.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Unpacking the behavioural components and delivery features of early childhood obesity prevention interventions in the TOPCHILD Collaboration: a systematic review and intervention coding protocol 95%
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 94%
- Transforming Obesity Prevention for CHILDren (TOPCHILD) Collaboration: protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of behavioural interventions for the prevention of early childhood obesity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic scoping review of adult obesity policy actions and weight-related services in a region of the United Kingdom using the Behaviour Change Wheel 94%
- Assessing the impact of a mandatory calorie labelling policy in out-of-home food outlets in England on consumer behaviour: a natural experimental study 92%
- Is the Healthy Start scheme associated with increased food expenditure in low-income families with young children in the United Kingdom? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Weight-normative messaging predominates on TikTok – a qualitative content analysis 94%
- Eating Disorders In weight-related Therapy (EDIT): Protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of eating disorder risk in behavioural weight management 94%
- A feasibility study to test a novel approach to dietary weight loss with a focus on assisting informed decision making in food selection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in weight gain recorded in English primary care before and during the Coronavirus-19 pandemic: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform 94%
- Mitigating the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions: The B ehavioural A ctivation in S ocial I so l ation (BASIL) pilot randomised controlled trial to prevent depression and loneliness among older people with long term conditions 92%
- Robust causal inference for long-term policy decisions: cost effectiveness of interventions for obesity using Mendelian randomization 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emulating randomized controlled trials of long-acting insulins and cardiovascular events using real-world data for patients with type 2 diabetes 92%
- The Medicines Intelligence Data Platform: A population-based data resource from New South Wales, Australia 90%
- Medication, Vaccine, and Folic Acid Use Among Pregnant Women in Belgium: Insights from the BELpREG Cohort 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.