Pan-genotypic probe-based enrichment to improve efficiency of Hepatitis B virus sequencing
Lumley, S. F.; Jennings, D.; Waddilove, E.; Trebes, A.; Delphin, M.; Downs, L. O.; Macintyre-Crockett, G.; Wu, Y.; Chaudron, S.; de Lara, C.; Chai, H.; Maponga, T.; Martin, J.; Collier, J.; Ip, C.; Barnes, E.; Bonsall, D.; Piazza, P.; Ansari, M. A.; Matthews, P. C.
Show abstract
Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) genome sequencing can be used to provide more complete genetic information at the population and individual level to shed light on the limitations of current interventions, and inform new strategies for elimination. HBV sequencing is challenging due to the partially dsDNA genome, high diversity, low viral loads and presence of large amounts of host genetic material in clinical samples. Here we describe the design and use of a pan-genotypic panel of 74 HBV specific capture-probes and nuclease treatment in improving sequencing efficiency. We processed 20 plasma samples (viral loads 1.98 to 4.07 log10, genotypes A-E) and three positive controls (human total brain RNA and bacteriophage lambda DNA) in triplicate to compare DNAse vs. RNAse vs. no nuclease treatment. We prepared libraries using the Takara Bio SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit v3, split the library in two, enriching half with the custom-designed probe panel and xGen Hybridization and Wash Kit (IDT), the other half was not enriched. Both libraries were sequenced on the NovaSeq6000 platform with 2x150nt paired-end reads. Capture resulted in a 47,970 fold increase in the number of reads mapped to the HBV genome in the "no nuclease" arm (243 HBV reads per million reads sequenced in the capture pool vs. 5x10-3 reads per million in the no-capture pool). Out of 20 samples, only 1 without capture generated HBV reads (viral load 3.89 log10 IU/ml) vs. 19 samples with capture. HBV sequence yield was increased in the capture arm and resulted in 2.30 log10 (95% confidence interval 1.99 - 2.48 log10) increase in HBV reads (per million reads sequenced) per log10 increase in viral load. The proportion of HBV reads increased a median of 12 fold with RNAse treatment. We developed a targeted pan-genotypic sequencing method using a custom panel of biotinylated oligos that increases the sequencing efficacy of HBV. This method will allow us to gain a better insight into HBV diversity.
Matching journals
The top 15 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of cell-associated DENV RNA by oligo(dT) primed 5' capture scRNAseq 92%
- Dramatic HIV DNA degradation associated with spontaneous HIV suppression and disease-free outcome in a young seropositive woman following her infection 92%
- Comparison of Nanopore with Illumina Whole Genome Assemblies of the Epstein-Barr Virus in Burkitt Lymphoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extraction-free direct PCR from dried serum spots permits HBV genotyping and RAS identification by Sanger and minION sequencing 94%
- A simplified, amplicon-based method for whole genome sequencing of human respiratory syncytial viruses 93%
- Evaluation of a Next Generation Sequencing Assay for Hepatitis B Antiviral Drug Resistance on the Oxford Nanopore System 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative analysis of the splice variants expressed by the major hepatitis B virus genotypes 93%
- Nanopore and Illumina Sequencing Reveal Different Viral Populations from Human Gut Samples 91%
- Analysis of the ARTIC V4 and V4.1 SARS-CoV-2 primers and their impact on the detection of Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 lineage defining mutations 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aberrant integration of Hepatitis B virus DNA promotes major restructuring of human hepatocellular carcinoma genome architecture 92%
- Deployable CRISPR-Cas13a diagnostic tools to detect and report Ebola and Lassa virus cases in real-time 91%
- Laboratory validation of a clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing assay for respiratory virus detection and discovery 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.