Back

Cerebellar Morphological Differences in Bipolar Disorder Type I

Harmata, G. I. S.; Barsotti, E. J.; Casten, L. G.; Fiedorowicz, J. G.; Williams, A. J.; Shaffer, J. J.; Richards, J. G.; Sathyaputri, L.; Schmitz, S. L.; Christensen, G. E.; Long, J. D.; Gaine, M. E.; Xu, J.; Michaelson, J. J.; Wemmie, J. A.; Magnotta, V. A.

2023-02-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.02.20.528549 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe neural underpinnings of bipolar disorder (BD) remain poorly understood. The cerebellum is ideally positioned to modulate emotional regulation circuitry yet has been understudied in BD. Previous studies have suggested differences in cerebellar activity and metabolism in BD, however findings on cerebellar structural differences remain contradictory. MethodsWe collected 3T anatomical MRI scans from participants with (N = 131) and without (N = 81) BD type I. Differences in cerebellar volumes were assessed along with factors that influence the results. ResultsThe cerebellar cortex was smaller bilaterally in participants with BD. Polygenic propensity score (bipolar N = 103, control N = 64) did not predict any cerebellar volumes, suggesting that non-genetic factors may have greater influence on the cerebellar volume difference we observed in BD. Cerebellar white matter volumes increased with more adverse childhood events, but we did not observe any associations with parental psychiatric illness. We also evaluated time from onset and symptom burden and found no associations with cerebellar volumes, suggesting neurodevelopment may differ prior to onset. Finally, we found taking sedatives was associated with larger cerebellar white matter and non-significantly larger cortical volume. LimitationsThis study was cross-sectional, limiting interpretation of possible mechanisms. Most of our participants were White, which could limit the generalizability. Additionally, we did not account for potential polypharmacy interactions. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that external influences, such as medications, may influence cerebellum structure in BD and may mask underlying differences. Accounting for medication may be critical for consistent findings in future studies.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.