Back

How appropriate is use of antiplatelet medications in patients with transient ischemic attacks and stroke: an analysis of 9132 patients over eight years

Naveed, H.; Akhtar, N.; Al Jerdi, S.; Uy, R. T.; Joseph, S.; Morgan, D.; Babu, B.; Shanti, S.; Shuaib, A.

2023-02-21 neurology
10.1101/2023.02.20.23286209 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and purposeGuidelines recommend patients with high-risk TIAs and minor stroke presenting within 1-3 days from onset be offered dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). There is little data on real-world adherence to these recommendations. We evaluated the appropriateness of DAPT use in TIA and stroke patients in a prospective Database. MethodsThe Qatar Stroke Database began enrollment of patients with TIAs and acute stroke in 2014 and currently has [~] 16,000 patients. For this study we evaluated the rates of guideline-adherent use of antiplatelet treatment at the time of discharge in patients with TIAs and stroke. TIAs were considered high-risk with ABCD2 score of 4 and minor stroke was defined as NIHSS 3. Patient demographics, clinical features, risk factors, previous medications, imaging and laboratory investigations, final diagnosis, discharge medications, and discharge and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were analyzed. ResultsAfter excluding patients with ICH, mimics and rare secondary causes, 8082 patients available for final analysis (TIAs: 1357;stroke 6725). In high-risk TIAs, 282 of 666 (42.3%) patients were discharged on DAPT. In patients with minor stroke, 1207 of 3572 (33.8%) patients were discharged on DAPT. DAPT was inappropriately offered to 238 of 691 (34.4%) of low-risk TIAs and 809 of 3153 (25.7%) of non-minor stroke patients. ConclusionsThis large database of prospectively collected patients with TIAs and stroke shows that, unfortunately, despite several guidelines, a large majority of patients with TIAs and stroke are receiving inappropriate antiplatelet treatment at discharge from hospital. This requires urgent attention and further investigation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.