Back

Postfire recovery of western US conifer forests (1984-2017) using space-borne lidar data

Ilangakoon, N. T.; Balch, J. K.; Nagy, R. C.; Iglesias, V.

2023-02-21 ecology
10.1101/2023.02.18.528502 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coniferous forests account for 78% of the western US forests and store a substantial amount of carbon. Wildfires significantly alter vegetation structure, and hence the forest carbon stock. This study evaluates post-fire vegetation recovery trajectories and rates across the western US using recently launched Global Ecosystem Dynamic Investigations (GEDI) mission lidar data. Three ecoregions studied here, the Pacific Northwest, Southern Rockies, and Northern Rockies, show fire severity and ecoregion specific recovery trajectories for canopy height (CH), plant area index (PAI), and the foliage height diversity (FHD). The recovery trajectories are characterized by an initial decline in vegetation structure (CH, PAI, and FHD) during the first 9-25 years postfire followed by a gain of the structure. Regions of low burn severity can fully recover to the unburned background state within the first three decades while the high burn severity regions may recover in the first century, but only in the absence of fires within this period. The PNW exhibits the slowest recovery rate. According to our results, all three ecoregions feature a loss of growing stock volume (GSV) (-1% - - 48%). Time since fire, fire severity, and altitude were identified as the most significant drivers of postfire vegetation recovery, likely because they integrate the distance to seed source, vegetation composition, and the local climate. Our study suggests that, if fire return intervals become shorter than 50 years, these three ecoregions will have significantly reduced their woody vegetation, hence the carbon stocks. In addition, all the ecoregions studied here exhibit extensive impacts from other disturbances such as beetle invasion. It is therefore important to consider the effects of compound disturbances on vegetation recovery trajectories to infer the future carbon potential in these ecosystems.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.