Back

The value of fetal placental ratio and placental efficiency in term human pregnancy and complications

Zhang, P.

2023-02-18 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2023.02.17.23286091 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFetal birth weight and placental weight have been extensively studied and used for clinical assessment of fetal development and maternal health. The ratio of fetal and placental weight as a tool for clinical use in human pregnancy is less studied. We compared the fetal birth weight, placental weight and fetal placental ratio in term pregnancy to see if fetal and placental ratio is useful in assessment of maternal health and pregnancy complication as well as fetal growth and development in singleton pregnancy. Material and methodsWe have collected the fetal birth data, maternal pregnancy data and placental pathology data from March 2000 to November 2021 in a single urban hospital. We compared the fetal birth weight, placental weight and fetal placental ratio in assessment of fetal growth, maternal pregnancy complications, and placental pathology with special emphasis on the role of fetal placental ratio. ResultsA total 3302 pairs of neonates and placentas from term singleton pregnancy were reviewed and fetal birth weight and placental weight were moderately correlated with Pearmans correlation coefficiency R=0.66. Fetal placental ratio as a proxy of placental efficiency was significantly associated with various pregnancy complications and placental pathology, and these associations were different from those of fetal birth weight or placental weight alone. High placental efficiency (90 percentile or greater) was associated with ethnic White, SARS-CoV2 status, category 2 fetal heart tracing and maternal inflammatory response in placenta while low placental efficiency (less than 10 percentile) was associated with ethnic Black, Asian and Hispanic, preeclampsia/pregnancy induced hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus. ConclusionFetal placental ratio was shown to be a useful indicator different from fetal birth weight and placental weight alone. Maternal and environmental factors were shown to have differential effects on fetal and placental growth. Understanding the mechanism of differential fetal and placental growth will help better manage the clinical relevant conditions such as IUGR and macrosomia.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.9%
2
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
7
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
8
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
16
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Placenta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%