Impact of Measurement Noise on Genetic Association Studies of Cardiac Function
Vukadinovic, M.; Renjith, G.; Yuan, V.; Kwan, A. C.; Cheng, S. C.; Li, D.; Clarke, S. L.; Ouyang, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundRecent studies have leveraged quantitative traits from imaging to amplify the power of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to gain further insights into the biology of diseases and traits. However, measurement imprecision is intrinsic to phenotyping and can impact downstream genetic analyses. MethodsLeft ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), an important but imprecise quantitative imaging measurement, was examined to assess the impact of precision of phenotype measurement on genetic studies. Multiple approaches to obtain LVEF, as well as simulated measurement noise, were evaluated with their impact on downstream genetic analyses. ResultsEven within the same population, small changes in the measurement of LVEF drastically impacted downstream genetic analyses. Introducing measurement noise as little as 7.9% can eliminate all significant genetic associations in an GWAS with almost forty thousand individuals. An increase of 1% in mean absolute error (MAE) in LVEF had an equivalent impact on GWAS power as a decrease of 10% in the cohort sample size, suggesting optimizing phenotyping precision is a cost-effective way to improve power of genetic studies. ConclusionsImproving the precision of phenotyping is important for maximizing the yield of genome-wide association studies. Clinical perspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat Is New?C_ST_ABSO_LIMeasurement imprecision in cardiac imaging phenotypes can substantially impact downstream genetic association studies, explaining much of the difference in identified genetic variants between echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. C_LIO_LIUsing the example of left ventricular ejection fraction as an important but imprecise clinical measurement, the analysis suggests that the measurement variation within the range of clinician interpretation reduced genome-wide association studies power to detect genetic risk factors as much as decreasing the study population size by 20%. C_LI What Are the Clinical Implications?O_LIMore precise measurements can result in a better understanding of the genetics of cardiac phenotypes and accelerate the development of precision medicine. C_LIO_LIRather than simply increasing population size, improving measurement precision allows for cost-effective discovery of genetic associations. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The HeartMagic prospective observational study protocol - characterizing subtypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction 94%
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 93%
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Reduces Atrial Arrhythmias Post-Cardiac Surgery and Attenuates Atrial Stress Responses to Cardioplegic Arrest 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- High Throughput Deep Learning Detection of Mitral Regurgitation 93%
- Right Ventricular Sarcomere Contractile Depression and the Role of Thick Filament Activation in Human Heart Failure with Pulmonary Hypertension 92%
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Algorithm for Predicting Valvular Heart Disease from Heart Sounds in an Unselected Cohort 93%
- Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing sex and racial bias in deep learning-based segmentation 93%
- DeepStrain: A Deep Learning Workflow for the Automated Characterization of Cardiac Mechanics 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.