Back

Predicting Brain Amyloid Positivity from T1 weighted brain MRI and MRI-derived Gray Matter, White Matter and CSF maps using Transfer Learning on 3D CNNs

Chattopadhyay, T.; Ozarkar, S. S.; Buwa, K.; Thomopoulos, S. I.; Thompson, P. M.

2023-02-16 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.02.15.528705 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Abnormal {beta}-amyloid (A{beta}) accumulation in the brain is an early indicator of Alzheimers disease and practical tests could help identify patients who could respond to treatment, now that promising anti-amyloid drugs are available. Even so, A{beta} positivity (A{beta}+) is assessed using PET or CSF assays, both highly invasive procedures. Here, we investigate how well A{beta}+ can be predicted from T1 weighted brain MRI and gray matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid segmentations from T1-weighted brain MRI (T1w), a less invasive alternative. We used 3D convolutional neural networks to predict A{beta}+ based on 3D brain MRI data, from 762 elderly subjects (mean age: 75.1 yrs. {+/-}7.6SD; 394F/368M; 459 healthy controls, 67 with MCI and 236 with dementia) scanned as part of the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. We also tested whether the accuracy increases when using transfer learning from the larger UK Biobank dataset. Overall, the 3D CNN predicted A{beta}+ with 76% balanced accuracy from T1w scans. The closest performance to this was using white matter maps alone when the model was pre-trained on an age prediction in the UK Biobank. The performance of individual tissue maps was less than the T1w, but transfer learning helped increase the accuracy. Although tests on more diverse data are warranted, deep learned models from standard MRI show initial promise for A{beta}+ estimation, before considering more invasive procedures. Clinical RelevanceEarly detection of A{beta} positivity from less invasive MRI images, could offer a screening test prior to more invasive testing procedures.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.