Common roles for serotonin in rats and humans for computations underlying flexible decision-making
Luo, Q.; Kanen, J. W.; Bari, A.; Skandali, N.; Langley, C.; Knudsen, G. M.; Alsio, J.; Phillips, B. U.; Sahakian, B. J.; Cardinal, R. N.; Robbins, T. W.
Show abstract
Serotonin is critical for adapting behavior flexibly to meet changing environmental demands. Cognitive flexibility is important both for successful attainment of goals, as well as for social interactions, and is frequently impaired in neuropsychiatric disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, a unifying mechanistic framework accounting for the role of serotonin in behavioral flexibility has remained elusive. Here, we demonstrate common effects of manipulating serotonin function across two species (rats and humans) on latent processes supporting choice behavior during probabilistic reversal learning using computational modelling. The findings support a role of serotonin in behavioral flexibility and plasticity, indicated, respectively, by increases or decreases in choice repetition ( stickiness) or reinforcement learning rates depending upon manipulations intended to increase or decrease serotonin function. More specifically, the rate at which expected value increased following reward and decreased following punishment (reward and punishment learning rates) was greatest after sub-chronic administration of the selective serotonin reuptake (SSRI) citalopram (5 mg/kg for 7 days followed by 10 mg/kg twice a day for 5 days) in rats. Conversely, humans given a single dose of an SSRI (20mg escitalopram), which can decrease post-synaptic serotonin signalling, and rats that received the neurotoxin 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT), which destroys forebrain serotonergic neurons, exhibited decreased reward learning rates. A basic perseverative tendency ( stickiness), or choice repetition irrespective of the outcome produced, was likewise increased in rats after the 12-day SSRI regimen and decreased after single dose SSRI in humans and 5,7-DHT in rats. These common effects of serotonergic manipulations on rats and humans - identified via computational modelling - suggest an evolutionarily conserved role for serotonin in plasticity and behavioral flexibility and have clinical relevance transdiagnostically for neuropsychiatric disorders.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spontaneous eye blink rate predicts individual differences in exploration and exploitation during reinforcement learning 94%
- JNK1 And Downstream Signalling Hubs Regulate Anxiety-Like Behaviours In A Zebrafish Larvae Phenotypic Screen 93%
- A Bayesian predictive approach for dealing with pseudoreplication 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ibrutinib as a Potential Therapeutic for Cocaine Use Disorder 94%
- Pharmacologic and genetic evidence converge on mechanisms of psychotic illness 93%
- Reliability of sucrose preference testing following short or no food and water deprivation - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of rat models of chronic unpredictable stress 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of acute and repeated administration of the selective M4 PAM VU0152099 on cocaine vs. food choice in male rats 94%
- Individual differences in the engagement of habitual control over alcohol seeking predicts the development of compulsive alcoholseeking and drinking 93%
- Enduring consequences of perinatal fentanyl exposure in mice 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortical dopamine reduces the impact of motivational biases governing automated behaviour 97%
- Role of the medial prefrontal cortex in the effects of rapid acting antidepressants on decision-making biases in rodents 95%
- Medial septum activation improves strategy switching once strategies are well learned via bidirectional regulation of dopamine neuron population activity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.