DOC screen completion time reflects executive function, speed of processing and fluency in an observational cohort study
Southwell, A.; Sujanthan, S.; Armel, T.; Xing, E.; Kapoor, A.; Liu, X. Y. E.; Lanctot, K. L.; Herrmann, N.; Murray, B. J.; Thorpe, K. E.; Cayley, M. L.; Sicard, M. N.; Lien, K.; Sahlas, D. J.; Swartz, R. H.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe DOC screen was developed to identify Depression, Obstructive sleep apnea, and Cognitive impairment ("DOC" comorbidities) after stroke. Each component has its own score, but additional information may be gained from the time to complete the screen. Cognitive screening completion time is rarely used as an outcome measure. We assessed the added value of using DOC screen completion time as a predictor of impairment on detailed cognitive assessments. MethodsConsecutive English-speaking new referrals to the stroke prevention clinic were consented to participate in detailed neuropsychological testing (n=437). DOC screen scores and times were compared to cognitive test scores using multiple linear regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. All linear regression analyses controlled for age, sex, years of education, and functional outcome as assessed by the modified Rankin score. ResultsAverage completion time for the DOC screen was 3.8 {+/-} 1.3 minutes. After accounting for age, sex and cognitive screen score, completion time was a significant independent predictor, of speed of processing (p = .002, 95% CI: -0.016 to -0.004), verbal fluency (p < .001, CI: -0.012 to -0.006) and executive (p = .004, CI: -0.006 to -0.001), but not memory, function. Completion time above 5.5 minutes (332.5 seconds) was associated with a high likelihood of impairment on gold standard executive (likelihood ratios 3.9-5.2) and speed of processing (likelihood ratio = 5.2) tasks. ConclusionsDOC screen completion time is easy to collect in routine care and is independently associated with speed of processing, language and executive dysfunctions after stroke. People who take more than 5.5 minutes to complete the DOC screen are likely to have deficits in executive functioning and speed of processing. These domains can be challenging to screen for in stroke survivors, and this measure provides a simple, clinically feasible method to screen for these under-appreciated concerns. Clinical Trials Registration Identifier: NCT02363114 Clinical Trials URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02363114
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impaired everyday executive functions and cognitive strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in individuals with stroke undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation 96%
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 95%
- Left Hemisphere Bias of NIH Stroke Scale is Most Severe for Middle Cerebral Artery Strokes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cognitive impairment is differentially associated with depression and anxiety at six-months post-stroke 92%
- Boston criteria v2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy without hemorrhage: An MRI-neuropathological validation study 91%
- Frequency of neurological manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 350 studies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal trajectories of global and domain-specific cognition after stroke using the Oxford Cognitive Screen 96%
- When two communication differences intersect: Comparing inpatient rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter 94%
- Blood Pressure Control From 2011 To 2019 In Patients 90 Days After Stroke 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 95%
- Documented Goals of Care Conversations with Hospitalized Patients after Severe Stroke 93%
- Time is Brain: Detection of Nonconvulsive Seizures and Status Epilepticus During Acute Stroke Evaluation Using Point-of-Care Electroencephalography 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Validation and Machine Learning Optimization of MyCog: A Self-Administered Cognitive Screener for Primary Care Settings 94%
- Reliability of remote self-administered web-based digital cognitive measures and comparison to in-person neuropsychological tests: Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test and the Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite 91%
- Self-reported word-finding complaints are associated with cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid and atrophy in cognitively normal older adults 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.