Back

Diffuse myocardial fibrosis associates with incident ventricular arrhythmia in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients

Olausson, E.; Wertz, J.; Fridman, Y.; Bering, P.; Maanja, M.; Niklasson, L.; Wong, T. C.; Fukui, M.; Cavalcante, J. L.; Cater, G.; Bukhari, S.; Kellman, P.; Miller, C. A.; Saba, S.; Ugander, M.; Schelbert, E. B.

2023-02-16 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.02.15.23285925
Show abstract

BackgroundDiffuse myocardial fibrosis (DMF) quantified by extracellular volume (ECV) may represent a vulnerable phenotype and associate with life threatening ventricular arrhythmias more than focal myocardial fibrosis. This principle remains important because 1) risk stratification for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) remains challenging, and 2) DMF may respond to current or emerging medical therapies (reversible substrate). ObjectivesTo evaluate the association between quantified by ECV in myocardium without focal fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with time from ICD implantation to 1) appropriate shock, or 2) shock or anti-tachycardia pacing. MethodsAmong patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) without congenital disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or amyloidosis who received ICDs (n=215), we used Cox regression to associate ECV with incident ICD therapy. ResultsAfter a median of 2.9 (IQR 1.5-4.2) years, 25 surviving patients experienced ICD shock and 44 experienced shock or anti-tachycardia pacing. ECV ranged from 20.2% to 39.4%. No patient with ECV<25% experienced an ICD shock. ECV associated with both endpoints, e.g., hazard ratio 2.17 (95%CI 1.17-4.00) for every 5% increase in ECV, p=0.014 in a stepwise model for ICD shock adjusting for ICD indication, age, smoking, atrial fibrillation, and myocardial infarction, whereas focal fibrosis by LGE and global longitudinal strain (GLS) did not. ConclusionsDMF measured by ECV associates with ventricular arrhythmias requiring ICD therapy in a dose-response fashion, even adjusting for potential confounding variables, focal fibrosis by LGE, and GLS. ECV-based risk stratification and DMF representing a therapeutic target to prevent ventricular arrhythmia warrant further investigation. Condensed AbstractAnalogous to heart failure and mortality outcomes, diffuse myocardial fibrosis (DMF) quantified by extracellular volume (ECV) may represent a more vulnerable phenotype for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia than focal myocardial fibrosis. In patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance, we identified 215 subsequently receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). After a median of 2.9 (IQR 1.5-4.2) years, 25 patients experienced ICD shock and 44 experienced shock or anti-tachycardia pacing. ECV associated with ICD therapy in Cox regression models. Focal fibrosis variables or global longitudinal strain did not. ECV-based risk stratification and DMF representing a therapeutic target to prevent ventricular arrhythmia warrant further investigation.

Matching journals

1
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
#1
58× avg
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
3
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 0.5%
42× avg
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.3%
48× avg
5
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 27%
6.6%
6
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
80× avg
7
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.4%
33× avg
8
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.5%
42× avg
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 3%
8.1× avg
10
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.6%
34× avg
11
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
18× avg
12
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
13
Atherosclerosis
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 2%
10.0× avg
14
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
15
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 2%
8.8× avg
16
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 40%
0.8%
17
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
18
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 28%
0.8%
19
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 20%
0.8%
20
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 14%
1.6× avg
21
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 5%
3.7× avg