Back

Development and Evaluation of a Clinical Guideline for a Pediatric Telemedicine and Medication Delivery Service: A Prospective Cohort Study in Haiti

Klarman, M. B.; Chi, X.; Cajusma, Y.; Flaherty, K. E.; Capois, A. C.; Vladimir Dofine, M. D.; Exantus, L.; Friesen, J.; Beau de Rochars, V. M.; Becker, T. K.; Baril, C.; Gurka, M. J.; Nelson, E. J.

2023-02-22 pediatrics
10.1101/2023.02.15.23285858 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveDespite the emergence of telemedicine as an important model for healthcare delivery, there is a lack of evidence-based telemedicine guidelines, especially for resource-limited settings. We sought to develop and evaluate a guideline for a pediatric telemedicine and medication delivery service (TMDS). MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted at a TMDS in Haiti; children [≤]10 years were enrolled. Among non-severe cases, paired virtual and in-person exams were conducted at the call center and household; severe cases were referred to the hospital. The primary outcome was the performance of the virtual exam compared to the in-person exam (reference standard). FindingsA total of 391 cases were enrolled. Among 320 cases with paired exams, no general World Health Organization (WHO) danger signs were identified at the household; problem-specific danger signs were identified in 6 cases (2%). Cohens kappa for the designation of mild cases was 0.78 (95%CI 0.69-0.87). Among components of the virtual exam, the sensitivity and specificity of a reported fever were 91% (87%-96%) and 69% (62%-74%), respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of fast breathing were 47% (21%-72%) and 89% (85%-94%), respectively. Kappa for dehydration assessments indicated moderate congruence (0.69; 95%CI 0.41-0.98). At 10 days, 95% (273) of the 287 cases reached were better/recovered. ConclusionThis study, and resulting guideline, represents a formative step towards an evidence-based pediatric telemedicine guideline built on WHO clinical principles. In-person exams for select cases were important to address limitations with virtual exams and identify cases for escalation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.0%
2
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
6
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
11
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
14
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
16
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
17
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
18
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
19
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
21
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%