Back

The Evolution of Democratic Peace

Hunt, K. L.; Patel, M.; Croft, D. P.; Franks, D. W.; Green, P. A.; Thompson, F. J.; Johnstone, R. A.; Cant, M. A.; Sankey, D. W. E.

2023-02-15 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.02.14.528470 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A major goal in evolutionary biology is to elucidate common principles that drive human and other animal societies to adopt either a warlike or peaceful nature. One proposed explanation for the variation in aggression between human societies is the democratic peace hypothesis. According to this theory, autocracies are more warlike than democracies because autocratic leaders can pursue fights for private gain. However, autocratic and democratic decision-making processes are not unique to humans and are widely observed across a diverse range of non-human animal societies. We use evolutionary game theory to evaluate whether the logic of democratic peace may apply across taxa; specifically adapting the classic Hawk-Dove model to consider conflict decisions made by groups rather than individuals. We find support for the democratic peace hypothesis without mechanisms involving complex human institutions and discuss how these findings might be relevant to non-human animal societies. We suggest that the degree to which collective decisions are shared may explain variation in the intensity of intergroup conflict in nature.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 393 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.7%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.7%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
7.8%
Similar papers in this journal
5
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 14%
7.8%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Ecology & Evolution
131 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
7
Evolution Letters
◐ 85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
9
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.0%
10
Ecology Letters
○ 135 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
11
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
12
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
13
Evolution
◐ 225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
16
Journal of Theoretical Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 72 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
Nature Physics
○ 45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Biological Reviews
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
○ 95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.