When is warmer better? Disentangling within- and between-generation effects of thermal history on survival
Rebolledo, A. P.; Sgro, C.; Monro, K.
Show abstract
O_LIUnderstanding the fitness consequences of thermal history is necessary to predict organismal responses to global warming. This is especially challenging for ectotherms with complex life cycles, since distinct life stages can differ in thermal sensitivity, acclimate to different thermal environments, and accrue responses to acclimation within and between generations. C_LIO_LIAlthough acclimation is widely hypothesized to benefit organisms by helping them (or their offspring) to compensate for negative impacts of environmental change, equivocal support for this hypothesis highlights the need to assess alternatives. However, assessments that do so in ways that explicitly dissect responses across life stages and generations remain limited. C_LIO_LIWe assess alternative hypotheses for acclimation responses (none, beneficial, colder-is-better, and warmer-is-better) within and between generations of an externally-fertilizing marine tubeworm whose vulnerability to warming rests on survival at early planktonic stages (gametes, embryos, and larvae). We start by acclimating parents, gametes, and embryos to ambient and projected warmer temperatures (17 {degrees}C and 22 {degrees}C) factorially by life stage. We then rear individuals with differing acclimation histories to the end of larval development at test temperatures from 10 {degrees}C to 28 {degrees}C (upper and lower survival limits) to estimate thermal survival curves for development, and compare curves among acclimation histories. C_LIO_LIWe show that survival curves are most responsive to parental acclimation followed by acclimation at embryogenesis, but are buffered against acclimation at fertilization. Moreover, curves respond independently to acclimation within and between generations, and respond largely as predicted by the warmer-is-better hypothesis, despite the semblance of beneficial acclimation after successive acclimations to warmer temperature. C_LIO_LIOur study demonstrates the varied nature of thermal acclimation, and the importance of considering how acclimation responses aggregate across complex life cycles when predicting vulnerability to warming. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multigenerational exposure to elevated temperatures leads to a reduction in standard metabolic rate in the wild 96%
- How do fluctuating temperatures alter the cost of development? 95%
- Warming undermines emergence success in a threatened alpine stonefly: a multi-trait perspective on vulnerability to climate change 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acclimation Capacity to Global Warming of Amphibians and Freshwater Fishes: Drivers, Patterns, and Data Limitations 95%
- Thermal acclimation to warmer temperatures can protect host populations from both further heat stress and the potential invasion of pathogens 94%
- Temperature-dependence of metabolic rate in tropical and temperate aquatic insects: support for the Climate Variability Hypothesis in mayflies but not stoneflies. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptation to warm environments with a fast pace of life in a marine predatory snail 93%
- Multispecies integrated population model reveals bottom-up dynamics in a seabird predator-prey system 91%
- Anthropogenic disturbance drives dispersal syndromes, demography, and gene flow in spatially structured amphibian populations 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interactions across life stages and thermal tolerance plasticity in Tigriopus californicus 96%
- Ecologically relevant thermal fluctuations enhance offspring fitness: biological and methodological implications for studies of thermal developmental plasticity 95%
- Predicting selection-response gradients of heat tolerance in a wide-ranging reef-building coral 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.