Deep evolution of MADS-box genes in Archaeplastida
Gramzow, L.; Tessari, C.; Rümpler, F.; Theissen, G.
Show abstract
MADS-box genes represent a paneukaryotic gene family encoding transcription factors. Given its importance for essential functions in plants, animals and fungi, such as development of organ identity and mating type determination, the phylogeny of MADS-box genes is of great biological interest. It has been well established that a gene duplication in the stem group of extant eukaryotes generated two clades of MADS-box genes, termed Type I and Type II genes. Almost all Type II genes of land plants contain a keratin-like (K) domain in addition to the family-defining, DNA-binding MADS (M) domain and are also termed MIKC-type genes. Due to a lack of sampling of MADS-box genes in Archaeplastida (rhodophytes, glaucophytes, chlorophytes, and streptophytes) except land plants, the deep evolution of MADS-box genes in plants remains poorly understood, however. Here we use the genomic and transcriptomic ressources that have become available in recent years to answer longstanding questions of MADS-box gene evolution in Archaeplastida. Our results reveal that archaeplastid algae likely do not harbour Type I MADS-box genes. However, rhodophytes, glaucophytes, prasinodermophytes and chlorophytes possess Type II MADS-box genes without a K domain. Type II MADS-box genes with a K domain are found only in streptophytes. This corroborates previous views that some Type II gene acquired a K domain in the stem group of extant streptophytes, generating MIKC-type genes. Interestingly, we found both variants of Type II genes - with (MIKC) and without a K domain - in streptophyte algae, but not in land plants (embryophytes), suggesting that Type II genes without a K domain (ancestral Type II genes) were lost in the stem group of land plants. Our data reveal that the deep evolution of MADS-box genes in "plants" (Archaeplastida) was more complex than has previously been thought.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural diversity and distribution of NMCP-class nuclear lamina proteins in streptophytic algae 94%
- Positive selection of a starch synthesis gene and phenotypic differentiation of starch accumulation in symbiotic and free-living coral symbiont dinoflagellate species 94%
- The order of trait emergence in the evolution of cyanobacterial multicellularity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- In the spotlight, losing IR region: insights from euglenophytes challenge the importance of inverted repeats in the genomes of secondary plastids 95%
- Molecular phylogeny of the SELMA translocation machinery recounts the evolution of complex photosynthetic eukaryotes. 95%
- Tightly constrained genome reduction and relaxation of purifying selection during secondary plastid endosymbiosis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chlorophyllide a oxygenase (CAO) gene duplication across the Viridiplantae 96%
- Diversification of Polynucleotide Kinase Clp1 Family Proteins and Their Possible Origins in Eukaryotic Evolution 94%
- Complete chloroplast genomes of Anthurium huixtlense and Pothos scandens (Pothoideae, Araceae): unique inverted repeat expansion and contraction affect rate of evolution 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nuclear genome of a pedinophyte pinpoints genomic innovation and streamlining in the green algae 95%
- Chromosome-level genome assembly of the photobiont alga Trebouxia sp. 'A48' from Xanthoria parietina provides new insight into the lichen symbiosis 94%
- Ferrous iron uptake via IRT1/ZIP evolved at least twice in green plants 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Life-cycle-related gene expression patterns in the brown algae 93%
- A putative origin of insect chemosensory receptors in the last common eukaryotic ancestor 92%
- Functional characterization of a "plant-like" HYL1 homolog in the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis indicates a conserved involvement in microRNA biogenesis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.