Back

The impact of patient-specific inlet conditions on oscillatory shear and helicity in haemodynamic simulations of aneurysmal Type-B Aortic Dissection

Stokes, C.; Ahmed, D.; Lind, N.; Haupt, F.; Becker, D.; Hamilton, J.; Muthurangu, V.; von Tengg-Kobligk, H.; Papadakis, G.; balabani, s.; Diaz, V.

2023-02-13 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.02.12.528194 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Type-B Aortic Dissection is a cardiovascular disease in which a tear develops in the intimal layer of the descending aorta, allowing pressurized blood to delaminate the layers of the vessel wall. In medically managed patients, long-term aneurysmal dilatation of the false lumen (FL) is considered virtually inevitable and is associated with poorer disease outcomes. While the pathophysiological mechanisms driving FL dilatation are not yet understood, hemodynamic factors are believed to play a key role. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and 4D-Flow MRI (4DMR) analyses have revealed correlations between flow helicity, oscillatory wall shear stress, and aneurysmal dilatation of the FL. In this study, we compare CFD simulations using a patient-specific, three-dimensional, three-component inlet velocity profile (3D IVP) extracted from 4DMR data against simulations with flow rate-matched uniform and axial velocity profiles that remain widely used in the absence of 4DMR. We also evaluate the influence of measurement errors in 4DMR data by scaling the 3D IVP to the degree of imaging error detected in prior studies. We observe that oscillatory shear and helicity are highly sensitive to inlet velocity distribution and flow volume throughout the FL and conclude that the choice of IVP may greatly affect the future clinical value of simulations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
6
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.9%
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.5%
10
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
11
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
22
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
24
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.5%
25
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%