Coupling allows robust redox circadian rhythms despite heterogeneity and noise
del Olmo, M.; Kalashnikov, A.; Schmal, C.; Kramer, A.; Herzel, H.
Show abstract
Circadian clocks are endogenous oscillators present in almost all cells that drive daily rhythms in physiology and behavior. There are two mechanisms that have been proposed to explain how circadian rhythms are generated in mammalian cells: through a transcription-translation feedback loop (TTFL) and based on oxidation/reduction reactions, both of which are intrinsically stochastic and heterogeneous at the single cell level. In order to explore the emerging properties of stochastic and heterogeneous redox oscillators, we simplify a recently developed kinetic model of redox oscillations to an amplitude-phase oscillator with twist (period-amplitude correlation) and subject to Gaussian noise. We show that noise and heterogeneity alone lead to fast desynchronization, and that coupling between noisy oscillators can establish robust and synchronized rhythms with amplitude expansions and tuning of the period due to twist. Coupling a network of redox oscillators to a simple model of the TTFL also contributes to synchronization, large amplitudes and fine-tuning of the period for appropriate interaction strengths. These results provide insights into how the circadian clock compensates randomness from intracellular sources and highlight the importance of noise, heterogeneity and coupling in the context of circadian oscillators.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Decoding the coupled decision-making of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metabolic reprogramming in cancer 95%
- Mechanisms Underlying the Complex Dynamics of Temperature Entrainment by a Circadian Clock 95%
- Spatially coordinated collective phosphorylation filters spatiotemporal noises for precise circadian timekeeping 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.