Mechanical Property Based Brain Age Prediction using Convolutional Neural Networks
Clements, R. G.; Claros-Olivares, C. C.; McIlvain, G.; Brockmeier, A. J.; Johnson, C. L.
Show abstract
Brain age is a quantitative estimate to explain an individuals structural and functional brain measurements relative to the overall population and is particularly valuable in describing differences related to developmental or neurodegenerative pathology. Accurately inferring brain age from brain imaging data requires sophisticated models that capture the underlying age-related brain changes. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a phase contrast MRI technology that uses external palpations to measure brain mechanical properties. Mechanical property measures of viscoelastic shear stiffness and damping ratio have been found to change across the entire life span and to reflect brain health due to neurodegenerative diseases and even individual differences in cognitive function. Here we develop and train a multi-modal 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) to model the relationship between age and whole brain mechanical properties. After training, the network maps the measurements and other inputs to a brain age prediction. We found high performance using the 3D maps of various mechanical properties to predict brain age. Stiffness maps alone were able to predict ages of the test group subjects with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.76 years, which is comparable to single inputs of damping ratio (MAE: 3.82) and outperforms single input of volume (MAE: 4.60). Combining stiffness and volume in a multimodal approach performed the best, with an MAE of 3.60 years, whereas including damping ratio worsened model performance. Our results reflect previous MRE literature that had demonstrated that stiffness is more strongly related to chronological age than damping ratio. This machine learning model provides the first prediction of brain age from brain biomechanical data--an advancement towards sensitively describing brain integrity differences in individuals with neuropathology.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain-Age Prediction: Systematic Evaluation of Site Effects, and Sample Age Range and Size 97%
- High spatial overlap but diverging age-related trajectories of cortical MRI markers aiming to represent intracortical myelin and microstructure 97%
- Mind the gap: performance metric evaluation in brain-age prediction 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting brain age across the adult lifespan with spontaneous oscillations and functional coupling in resting brain networks captured with magnetoencephalography 97%
- Internally-consistent and fully-unbiased multimodal MRI brain template construction from UK Biobank: Oxford-MM 97%
- Mechanical Properties of White Matter Tracts in Aging Assessed via Anisotropic MR Elastography 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating brain age from structural MRI and MEG data: Insights from dimensionality reduction techniques 98%
- Brain-age prediction: a systematic comparison of machine learning workflows 97%
- Reliability and sensitivity of two whole-brain segmentation approaches included in FreeSurfer - ASEG and SAMSEG 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the effects of healthy cognitive aging on brain functional connectivity using 4.7 T resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 95%
- Comparing Intra- and Inter-individual Correlational Brain Connectivity from Functional and Structural Neuroimaging Data 95%
- Cognitive-and lifestyle-related microstructural variation in the ageing human hippocampus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing data-driven physiological denoising approaches for resting-state fMRI: Implications for the study of aging 96%
- Multi-channel 4D parametrized Atlas of Macro- and Microstructural Neonatal Brain Development 95%
- Establishing a baseline for human cortical folding morphological variables: a multicenter study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.