Confidential Screening for and Management of Intimate Partner Violence Risk using a Commercial Electronic Health Records System
Lenert, L. A.; Diaz, V.; Simpson, K.; Hahn, C.; Aiken, M.; Szwast, E.; Sox, L.; Pekar, E.; Ennis, N.; Rheingold, A.
Show abstract
Intimate partner violence is, unfortunately, a common problem (25% of women) for which screening in primary care is a recommended service. In this paper, we describe modifications to a commercial EHR system (Epic) designed to support confidential screening for and management of IPV in primary care settings. Modifications include the use of an exam room computer as a kiosk for patient-generated health data entry, storage of data in a hidden location, the use of rule-based alerting methods to direct providers to access data, and electronic form-based tools for case management and documentation. While preserving privacy, this approach also allows access by provider type and authorized setting, including use for population health management. The approach was tested in a pilot study and found to be feasible, to have good compliance for provider screening (65%) and is being evaluated in a stepped-wedge trial in other primary care clinics across a large academic health system.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “Endless Opportunities”: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to scale-up of two-way texting follow-up after voluntary medical male circumcision in Zimbabwe 93%
- Clinical code sets and the problem of redundancy in code set repositories 93%
- Health worker acceptability of an HIV testing mobile health application within a rural Zambian HIV treatment programme 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 94%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 93%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 91%
- Challenges in Implementing a Mobile AI Chatbot Intervention for Depression Among Youth on Psychiatric Waiting Lists: A Randomized Control Study Termination Report 91%
- The role of IT ambidexterity, digital dynamic capability and knowledge processes as enablers of patient agility: an empirical study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying and preventing fraudulent responses in online public health surveys: Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 91%
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.