Back

Highly efficient induction of functionally mature excitatory neurons from feeder-free human ES/iPS cells

Zhou, Z.; Kakegawa, W.; Fujimori, K.; Sho, M.; Shimamura, R.; Supakul, S.; Yoshimatsu, S.; Kohyama, J.; Yuzaki, M.; Okano, H.

2023-02-12 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.02.10.528087 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cortical excitatory neurons (Cx neurons) are the most dominant neuronal cell type in the cerebral cortex, which play a central role in cognition, perception, intellectual behavior and emotional processing. Robust in vitro induction of Cx neurons may facilitate as a tool for the elucidation of brain development and pathomechanism of the intractable neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimers disease, and thus potentially contribute to drug development. Here, we report a defined method for efficient induction of Cx neurons from the feeder-free-conditioned human embryonic stem cells (ES cells) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells). By using this method, human ES/iPS cells could be differentiated into ~99% MAP2-positive neurons by three weeks, and these induced neurons, within five weeks, presented various characteristics of mature excitatory neurons such as strong expression of glutamatergic neuron-specific markers (subunits of AMPA and NDMA receptors and CAMKII), highly synchronized spontaneous firing and excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC). Moreover, the Cx neurons showed susceptibility to the toxicity of A{beta}42 oligomers and excitotoxicity of excessive glutamates, which is another advantage in terms of toxicity test and searching for the therapeutic agents. Taken together, this study provides a novel research platform for the study of neural development and degeneration based on the feeder-free human ES/iPS cell system.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.