Back

An immune cell lipid atlas reveals the basis of susceptibility to ferroptosis

Pernes, G.; Morgan, P. K.; Huynh, K.; Giles, C.; Paul, S.; Smith, A. A. T.; Mellett, N. A.; Bertuzzo Veiga, C.; Collins, T. J.; De Silva, T. M.; Lee, M. K.; Meikle, P. J.; Lancaster, G. I.; Murphy, A. J.

2023-02-10 cell biology
10.1101/2023.02.10.528075 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The cellular lipidome is comprised of thousands of unique lipid species. This complexity underpins the many roles of lipids in cellular biology. How lipidome composition varies between cell types and how such differences contribute to cell-specific functionality is poorly understood. Here, using mass spectrometry-based targeted lipidomics, we have characterised the cellular lipid landscape of the human and mouse immune systems (www.cellularlipidatlas.com). We find that myeloid and lymphoid cell lineages have unique lipid compositions, notably in the usage of ester and ether bonds within glycerophospholipids (PLs) and PL acyl chain composition. To determine if immune cell-specific lipid phenotypes promote cell-specific functional properties we focused on differences in poly-unsaturated fatty acid (PUFA)-containing PL, the levels of which are markedly higher in lymphoid cells relative to myeloid cells. We firstly show that differences in PUFA-PL content provides a mechanistic basis for previously described differences in immune cell susceptibility to ferroptosis, a form of cell death driven by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, and secondly, that the low PUFA-PL content of neutrophils restrains NADPH oxidase-driven ferroptosis. In summary, we show that the lipid landscape is a defining feature of immune cell identity and that cell-specific lipid phenotypes underpin aspects of immune cell physiology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.