Identification and analysis of individuals who deviate from their genetically-predicted phenotype
Hawkes, G.; Yengo, L.; Vendantam, S.; Marouli, E.; Beaumont, R. N.; the GIANT Consortium, ; Tyrrell, J.; Weedon, M. N.; Hirschhorn, J.; Frayling, T.; Wood, A. R.
Show abstract
Findings from genome-wide association studies have facilitated the generation of genetic predictors for many common human phenotypes. Stratifying individuals misaligned to a genetic predictor based on common variants may be important for follow-up studies that aim to identify alternative causal factors. Using genome-wide imputed genetic data, we aimed to classify 158,951 unrelated individuals from the UK Biobank as either concordant or deviating from two well-measured phenotypes. We first applied our methods to standing height: our primary analysis classified 244 individuals (0.15%) as misaligned to their genetically predicted height. We show that these individuals are enriched for self-reporting being shorter or taller than average at age 10, diagnosed congenital malformations, and rare loss-of-function variants in genes previously catalogued as causal for growth disorders. Secondly, we apply our methods to LDL cholesterol. We classified 156 (0.12%) individuals as misaligned to their genetically predicted LDL cholesterol and show that these individuals were enriched for both clinically actionable cardiovascular risk factors and rare genetic variants in genes previously shown to be involved in metabolic processes. Individuals whose LDL-C was higher than expected based on the genetic predictor were also at higher risk of developing coronary artery disease and type-two diabetes, even after adjustment for measured LDL-C, BMI and age, suggesting upward deviation from genetically predicted LDL-C is indicative of generally poor health. Our results remained broadly consistent when performing sensitivity analysis based on a variety of parametric and non-parametric methods to define individuals deviating from polygenic expectation. Our analyses demonstrate the potential importance of quantitatively identifying individuals for further follow-up based on deviation from genetic predictions. Author SummaryHuman genetics is becoming increasingly useful to help predict human traits across a population owing to findings from large-scale genetic association studies and advances in the power of genetic predictors. This provides an opportunity to potentially identify individuals that deviate from genetic predictions for a common phenotype under investigation. For example, an individual may be genetically predicted to be tall, but be shorter than expected. It is potentially important to identify individuals who deviate from genetic predictions as this can facilitate further follow-up to assess likely causes. Using 158,951 unrelated individuals from the UK Biobank, with height and LDL cholesterol, as exemplar traits, we demonstrate that approximately 0.15% & 0.12% of individuals deviate from their genetically predicted phenotypes respectively. We observed these individuals to be enriched for a range of rare clinical diagnoses, as well as rare genetic factors that may be causal. Our analyses also demonstrate several methods for detecting individuals who deviate from genetic predictions that can be applied to a range of continuous human phenotypes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-genome sequencing analysis of anthropometric traits in 672,976 individuals reveals convergence between rare and common genetic associations 96%
- Evaluating transportability of in-vitro cellular models to in-vivo human phenotypes using gene perturbation data 96%
- Within-family studies for Mendelian randomization: avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Imputed Gene Expression Risk Scores: A Functionally Informed Component of Polygenic Risk 94%
- Genome-wide gene-diet interaction analysis in the UK Biobank identifies novel effects on Hemoglobin A1c 94%
- Evaluating and implementing block jackknife resampling Mendelian randomization to mitigate bias induced by overlapping samples 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrated Analyses of Growth Differentiation Factor-15 Concentration and Cardiometabolic Diseases in Humans 94%
- Risk factors affecting polygenic score performance across diverse cohorts 94%
- 3D genomic features across >50 diverse cell types reveal insights into the genomic architecture of childhood obesity 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.