Back

Real-world body orientation impacts virtual navigation experience and performance

Moon, H.-J.; Wu, H.-P.; De Falco, E.; Blanke, O.

2023-02-12 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.02.10.527966 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Most human navigation studies in MRI rely on virtual navigation. However, the necessary supine position in MRI makes it fundamentally different from daily ecological navigation. Nonetheless, until now, no study has assessed whether differences in physical body orientation (BO) affect participants experienced BO during virtual navigation. Here, combining an immersive virtual reality (VR) navigation task with subjective BO measures and implicit behavioral measures, we demonstrate that physical BO (either standing or supine) modulated experienced BO. Also, we show that standing upright BO is preferred during spatial navigation: participants were more likely to experience a standing BO and were better at spatial navigation when standing upright. Importantly, we report that showing a supine virtual agent reduces the conflict between the preferred BO and physical supine BO. Our study provides critical, but missing, information regarding experienced BO during virtual navigation, which should be considered cautiously when designing navigation studies, especially in MRI. Visual Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=99 SRC="FIGDIR/small/527966v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (19K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7a4df0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@192f0d7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ba37org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@168866c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.