Back

Role of genetics in capturing racial disparities in cardiovascular disease

Bose, A.; Platt, D. E.; Kartoun, U.; Ng, K.; PARIDA, L.

2023-02-14 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.02.10.23285769 medRxiv
Show abstract

The role of race in medical decision-making has been a contentious issue. Insights from history and population genetics suggest considering race as a differentiating marker for medical practices can be influenced by systemic bias, leading to serious errors. This may negatively impact treatment of complex diseases such as cardiovascular disease (CVD). We seek to identify instrumental variables and independently verifiable epidemiological tests of whether diagnoses and treatments impacting severe cardiovascular conditions are racially linked. Using data from the UK Biobank (UKB), we found minimal, non-significant racial differences in log odds ratio (OR) between a range of cardiovascular outcomes such as atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, coronary thrombosis, heart failure and cardiac fatality. Genetics classification with respect to principal components vs. racial identification of Black British showed no significant differences in diagnoses or therapeutics for CVD related diseases and their associated comorbidities. However, Black British had significant risk of association with genetically predisposed risk of CVD as captured by polygenic risk scores (PRS) of CVD (OR=1.12; 95%CI:1.034-1.223; p < 0.006) as well as in 14 related traits. We used a sub-population based feature selection method to find Townsend Deprivation Index, smoking history, hypertension, PRS for ischemic stroke, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and type II diabetes as the top features predicting the ethnographic category of Black British with an AUC of 79.5%. Therefore, PRS can be used to understand racial disparities in disease outcome which is otherwise not reflected in clinical factors such as diagnoses outcome status or therapeutics in large observational cohorts such as UKB. PRS yield better predictive power with underrepresented minorities and can improve clinical decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
52.5%
50% of probability mass above
2
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
5
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
8
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
10
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
14
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
29
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
30
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%