Relative effectiveness of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines and homologous boosting in preventing COVID-19 in adults in the US
Nguyen, V. H.; Boileau, C.; Bogdanov, A.; Sredl, M.; Bonafede, M.; Ducruet, T.; Chavers, S.; Rosen, A.; Martin, D.; Buck, P.; Esposito, D.; Van de Velde, N.; Mansi, J. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundFew head-to-head comparisons have been performed on the real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 booster vaccines. We evaluated the relative effectiveness (rVE) of a primary series of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S and a homologous mRNA booster against medically-attended, outpatient, and hospitalized COVID-19. MethodsA dataset linking primary care electronic medical records with medical claims data was used for this retrospective cohort study of US patients [≥]18 years vaccinated with a primary series between February and October 2021 (Part 1) and a homologous mRNA booster between October 2021 and January 2022 (Part 2). Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were derived from 1:1 matching adjusted across potential covariates. rVE was (1-HRadjusted) x 100. Additional analysis was performed across regions and age groups. ResultsFollowing adjustment, Part 1 rVE for mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 was 23% (95% CI: 22%-25%), 23% (22%-25%), and 19% (14%-24%) whilst the rVE for mRNA-1273 versus Ad26.COV2.S was 50% (48%-51%), 50% (48%-52%), and 57% (53%-61%) against any medically-attended, outpatient, and hospitalized COVID-19, respectively. The adjusted rVE in Part 2 for mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 was 14% (10%-18%), 13% (8%- 17%), and 19% (1%-34%) against any medically-attended, outpatient, and hospitalized COVID-19, respectively. rVE against medically-attended COVID-19 was higher in adults [≥]65 years (35%; 24%-47%) than those 18-64 years (13%; 9%-17%) after the booster. ConclusionsIn this study, mRNA-1273 was more effective than BNT162b2 or Ad26.COV2.S following primary series during a Delta-dominant period, and than BNT162b2 as a booster during an Omicron-dominant period. Key pointsmRNA-1273 was associated with a lower risk than BNT162b2 or Ad26.COV2.S of any medically-attended, outpatient, or hospitalized COVID-19 after primary series and of any medically-attended, outpatient, or hospitalized COVID-19 vs BNT162b2 after a homologous mRNA booster
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of a third dose of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 among adults aged ≥65 years in the United States 98%
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting 97%
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccines among immunocompromised adults in the United States 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine NVX-CoV2373 in Younger and Older Adults 96%
- Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization with the Alpha, Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants: a nationwide Danish cohort study 94%
- Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous boost immunization with an adenovirus type-5-vectored and protein-subunit-based COVID-19 vaccine (Convidecia/ZF2001): a randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalization and death in Canada: A multiprovincial test-negative design study 96%
- Two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness with mixed schedules and extended dosing intervals: test-negative design studies from British Columbia and Quebec, Canada 95%
- Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections during the Delta variant epidemic in Japan: Vaccine Effectiveness Real-time Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 (VERSUS) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of the Bivalent (Original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines mRNA-1273.222 and BNT162b2 Bivalent in Adults With Underlying Medical Conditions in the United States 96%
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 95%
- Post-vaccination neutralization responses to Omicron sub-variants 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against SARS-CoV-2 omicron and delta variants 96%
- Immune Memory Response After a Booster Injection of mRNA-1273 for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) 95%
- BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant in Qatar 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.