Better performance of deep learning pulmonary nodule detection using chest radiography with reference to computed tomography: data quality is matter
Kim, J. Y.; Ryu, W.-S.; Kim, D.; Kim, E. Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundLabeling error may restrict radiography-based deep learning algorithms in screening lung cancer using chest radiography. Physicians also need precise location information for small nodules. We hypothesized that a deep learning approach using chest radiography data with pixel-level labels referencing computed tomography enhances nodule detection and localization compared to a data with only image-level labels. MethodsNational Institute Health dataset, chest radiograph-based labeling dataset, and AI-HUB dataset, computed tomography-based labeling dataset were used. As a deep learning algorithm, we employed Densenet with Squeeze-and-Excitation blocks. We constructed four models to examine whether labeling based on chest computed tomography versus chest X-ray and pixel-level labeling versus image-level labeling improves the performance of deep learning in nodule detection. Using two external datasets, models were evaluated and compared. ResultsExternally validated, the model trained with AI-HUB data (area under curve [AUC] 0.88 and 0.78) outperformed the model trained with NIH (AUC 0.71 and 0.73). In external datasets, the model trained with pixel-level AI-HUB data performed the best (AUC 0.91 and 0.86). In terms of nodule localization, the model trained with AI-HUB data annotated at the pixel level demonstrated dice coefficient greater than 0.60 across all validation datasets, outperforming models trained with image-level annotation data, whose dice coefficient ranged from 0.36-0.58. ConclusionOur findings imply that precise labeled data are required for constructing robust and reliable deep learning nodule detection models on chest radiograph. In addition, it is anticipated that the deep learning model trained with pixel-level data will provide nodule location information.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 97%
- High-Dimensional Multinomial Multiclass Severity Scoring of COVID-19 Pneumonia Using CT Radiomics Features and Machine Learning Algorithms 96%
- An ML prediction model based on clinical parameters and automated CT scan features for COVID-19 patients 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 95%
- Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass opacity: utilizing radiomics model in clinical translation 94%
- A deep learning algorithm using CT images to screen for Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 95%
- Deep learning models for poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images using transfer learning 92%
- Volumetric lung cancer screening reduces unnecessary low-dose computed tomography scans: results from a single-centre prospective trial on 4,119 subjects 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 95%
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Detecting Signs of Tuberculosis on Chest Radiographs among US-bound Immigrants and Refugees 95%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 95%
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 95%
- SCU-Net: A deep learning method for segmentation and quantification of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.