Gametic selection and mating systems show mutually dependent evolution
Scott, M. F.; Immler, S.
Show abstract
Competition among pollen or sperm (gametic selection) can cause evolution. Mating systems shape the intensity of gametic selection by determining the competitors involved, which can in turn cause mating system evolution. We model the bidirectional relationship between gametic selection and mating systems, focussing on variation in female mating frequency (monandry-polyandry) and self-fertilisation (selfing-outcrossing). First, we find that mating systems affect evolutionary responses to gametic selection, with more effective gametic selection when fertilisation success depends on haploid genotypes, rather than the diploid genotype of the father. Monandry and selfing both reduce the efficacy of gametic selection despite creating intense selection among pollen/sperm from heterozygous males with haploid expression. This effect means selfing can increase mutation load, in contrast to classic predictions where selfing purges deleterious mutations. Second, we show that mating systems can evolve via their effect on gametic selection, with polyandry evolving because it removes deleterious alleles more efficiently and increases offspring fitness. Our population genetic models reveal that this good sperm effect could plausibly give a selective advantage for polyandry over monandry of only around 1%. Selection for polyandry is lessened further if some loci experience balancing selection and is likely to be overwhelmed by any direct fitness effects of mating systems. Similarly, the indirect benefits from manipulating gametic selection have a weak influence on the evolution of selfing, which is dominated by automatic selection and inbreeding depression in our model. Nevertheless, gametic selection can be potentially decisive for selfing evolution because it significantly reduces inbreeding depression, which favours selfing. One test of the predicted interactions between gametic selection and mating system evolution would be to compare evolutionary rates in genes with different expression patterns across different mating systems.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Substitution load revisited: a high proportion of deaths can be selective 97%
- The rates of introgression and barriers to genetic exchange between hybridizing species: sex chromosomes vs. autosomes 97%
- Modeling the genetic footprint of fluctuating balancing selection: From the local to the genomic scale 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The joint evolution of separate sexes and sexual dimorphism 97%
- Hidden genetic variance contributes to increase the short-term adaptive potential of selfing populations 97%
- Hoisted with his own petard: how sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila affinis creates resistance alleles that limit its spread 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Which cues are sexy? The evolution of mate preference in sympatric species reveals the contrasted effect of adaptation and reproductive interference. 97%
- How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations ? 96%
- Hybridization enables the fixation of selfish queen genotypes in eusocial colonies 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.