Back

LINKIN-associated proteins necessary for tissue integrity during collective cell migration

Tan, C.-H.; Cheng, K.-W.; Park, H.; Chou, T.-F.; Sternberg, P. W.

2023-02-09 developmental biology Community evaluation
10.1101/2023.02.08.527750 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell adhesion plays essential roles in almost every aspect of metazoan biology. LINKIN (Human: ITFG1, Caenorhabditis elegans: lnkn-1) is a conserved transmembrane protein that has been identified to be necessary for tissue integrity during migration. In C. elegans, loss of lnkn-1 results in the detachment of the lead migratory cell from the rest of the developing male gonad. Previously, three interactors of ITFG1/lnkn-1 - RUVBL1/ruvb-1, RUVBL2/ruvb-2, and alpha-tubulin - were identified by immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) analysis using human HEK293T cells and then validated in the nematode male gonad. The ITFG1-RUVBL1 interaction has since been independently validated in a breast cancer cell line model that also implicates the involvement of the pair in metastasis. Here, we showed that epitope-tagged ITFG1 localized to the cell surface of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Using IP-MS analysis, we identified a new list of potential interactors of ITFG1. Loss-of-function analysis of their C. elegans orthologs found that three of the interactors - ATP9A/tat-5, NME1/ndk-1, and ANAPC2/apc-2 - displayed migratory detachment phenotypes similar to that of lnkn-1. Taken together with the other genes whose reduction-of-function phenotype is similar to that of lnkn-1 (notably cohesion and condensin), suggests the involvement of membrane remodeling and chromosome biology in LINKIN-dependent cell adhesion and supports the hypothesis for a structural role of chromosomes in post-mitotic cells.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.