Back

A Multi-omic and Multi-Species Analysis of Right Ventricular Failure

Mendelson, J. B.; Sternbach, J. D.; Doyle, M. J.; Mills, L.; Hartweck, L. M.; Tollison, W.; Carney, J. P.; Lahti, M. T.; Bianco, R. W.; Kalra, R.; Kazmirczak, F.; Hindmarch, C.; Archer, S. L.; Prins, K. W.; Martin, C. M.

2023-02-08 biochemistry
10.1101/2023.02.08.527661 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in multiple cardiovascular diseases, but there are no approved treatments for RVF as therapeutic targets are not clearly defined. Contemporary transcriptomic/proteomic evaluations of RVF are predominately conducted in small animal studies, and data from large animal models are sparse. Moreover, a comparison of the molecular mediators of RVF across species is lacking. Here, we used transcriptomics and proteomics analyses to define the molecular pathways associated with cardiac MRI-derived values of RV hypertrophy, dilation, and dysfunction in pulmonary artery banded (PAB) piglets. Publicly available data from rat monocrotaline-induced RVF and pulmonary arterial hypertension patients with preserved or impaired RV function were used to compare the three species. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses identified multiple pathways that were associated with RV dysfunction and remodeling in PAB pigs. Surprisingly, disruptions in fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and electron transport chain (ETC) proteins were different across the three species. FAO and ETC proteins and transcripts were mostly downregulated in rats, but were predominately upregulated in PAB pigs, which more closely matched the human data. Thus, the pig PAB metabolic molecular signature was more similar to human RVF than rodents. These data suggest there may be divergent molecular responses of RVF across species, and that pigs more accurately recapitulate the metabolic aspects of human RVF.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.6%
5
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
7
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
8
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
17
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
19
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%