Back

Transcranial alternating current stimulation affects several alpha components depending on their frequencies relative to the stimulation frequency

Shibusawa, S.; Kawashima, T.; Amano, K.

2023-02-10 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.02.08.527578 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe aftereffects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), especially targeting occipital alpha oscillations, have been reported to show large individual differences in behavioural effects and neural responsiveness. We predicted that this variance at least partly originates from the fact that multiple alpha components are affected differently by alpha-tACS. ObjectiveTo test the above prediction, we decomposed several alpha components from the data and evaluated the aftereffects separately for each component and participant. More specifically, we tested how the difference between the stimulation frequency and peak frequency influences the aftereffects of tACS on each alpha component. MethodsEighteen participants received 20-min tACS or sham stimulation on separate days. Ten minutes of magnetoencephalography data were collected before and after stimulation, and spectral analysis was performed with a high-frequency resolution (0.1 Hz) to disentangle different alpha components based on the difference in peak frequencies and spatial patterns. Results: The results revealed three alpha components with slightly different frequencies. tACS increased or decreased the power of these alpha components depending on the relative frequency difference from electrical stimulation. Furthermore, observable components differed among participants, possibly because of anatomical differences in each alpha source. ConclusionWhen each alpha component is not analysed separately, the change in overall alpha power will be a combination of decreased or increased components, and inter-individual differences will become larger. Our study highlights the importance of noting the presence of multiple alpha components with relatively small differences in the peak frequency for experimental design and analysis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.