Transcranial alternating current stimulation affects several alpha components depending on their frequencies relative to the stimulation frequency
Shibusawa, S.; Kawashima, T.; Amano, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe aftereffects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), especially targeting occipital alpha oscillations, have been reported to show large individual differences in behavioural effects and neural responsiveness. We predicted that this variance at least partly originates from the fact that multiple alpha components are affected differently by alpha-tACS. ObjectiveTo test the above prediction, we decomposed several alpha components from the data and evaluated the aftereffects separately for each component and participant. More specifically, we tested how the difference between the stimulation frequency and peak frequency influences the aftereffects of tACS on each alpha component. MethodsEighteen participants received 20-min tACS or sham stimulation on separate days. Ten minutes of magnetoencephalography data were collected before and after stimulation, and spectral analysis was performed with a high-frequency resolution (0.1 Hz) to disentangle different alpha components based on the difference in peak frequencies and spatial patterns. Results: The results revealed three alpha components with slightly different frequencies. tACS increased or decreased the power of these alpha components depending on the relative frequency difference from electrical stimulation. Furthermore, observable components differed among participants, possibly because of anatomical differences in each alpha source. ConclusionWhen each alpha component is not analysed separately, the change in overall alpha power will be a combination of decreased or increased components, and inter-individual differences will become larger. Our study highlights the importance of noting the presence of multiple alpha components with relatively small differences in the peak frequency for experimental design and analysis.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The cerebellar clock: predicting and timing somatosensory touch 97%
- Early beta oscillations in multisensory association areas underlie crossmodal performance enhancement 97%
- Stimulation Artifact Source Separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decomposing the effects of alpha-tACS on brain oscillations and aperiodic 1/f activity 97%
- The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability 96%
- Transferability of cathodal tDCS effects from the primary motor to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a multimodal TMS-EEG study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterising the contribution of auditory and somatosensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials following stimulation of prefrontal, premotor and parietal cortex 96%
- Phase-synchronized 40Hz tACS and iTBS effects on gamma oscillations 96%
- Transcallosal generation of phase aligned beta-bursts underlies TMS-induced interhemispheric inhibition 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.