Back

Major outbreak of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: A retrospective cohort in northern Brazil

Perez da Silva Pereira, P.; Carvalho Sabini, A. A.; Ferreira de Almeida, R. M.; Oliveira Pontes, D.; Bezerra Mororo Alves, M. M.; Alves de Sousa, V.; da Silva Azevedo, M.; de Souza Botelho, A.; Freire Ramalhaes, S.; Batista da Silva, E.

2023-02-10 ophthalmology
10.1101/2023.02.08.23285557 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEndophthalmitis is one of the most important adverse events after cataract surgery as it can lead to total vision loss. The aim of this study was to describe the occurrence of endophthalmitis after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation among patients assisted during a joint effort in Porto Velho, Rondonia, Brazil. MethodThis is a retrospective cohort study, carried out from a bank with 649 medical records of patients who underwent surgery. Descriptive analysis and multiple analysis using Robust Poisson Regression were performed to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). A statistical analysis was performed using the statistical program Stata(R) version 16.0 (College Station, Texas, USA). ResultsThe incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis confirmed by culture was 10.88%, the highest ever recorded in the world. A higher risk for endophthalmitis was found, in probable cases, among males (RR: 1.88; 95%CI:1.03; 3.44) and brown and yellow skin color (RR: 2.78; 95 %CI %: 1.17; 6.60). For confirmed and probable cases, bilateral surgery and specific lens model were also risk factors. The predominant etiological agents were gram-negative and the main clinical manifestation was corneal edema. The average number of days to start treatment was eight days and 27.12% used antibiotics. ConclusionSpecific protocols are needed for cataract surgeries that encompass hiring, performing and monitoring these services to ensure good practices and patient safety.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.